<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Couch Potatoes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2010-01-08:/couchpotatoes//33</id>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:22Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 5.01</generator>

<entry>
    <title>REVIEW: Up: Simple yet evocative</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/06/04/review-up-simple-yet-evocative/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10352</id>

    <published>2009-06-04T02:32:16Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:22Z</updated>

    <summary>By Clarence Yu IT was a cool Saturday evening as people of all ages and all walks of life wand ered together, almost telepathically, to see Pixar Studios&apos; latest offering, Up . What is so great about this movie that...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>By Clarence Yu
</strong>

IT was a cool Saturday evening as people of all ages and all walks of life wand
ered together, almost telepathically, to see Pixar Studios' latest offering, Up
. What is so great about this movie that drew a full crowd--something I haven't
 seen in quite a while?

For one, the film is a Pixar movie, which is always an event in itself. Pixar h
as always been known to create high quality animated pictures, from Toy Story t
o their most recent entry WALL-E, which was released last year. Up is the tenth
 full-length film from the studio since--a run that began with Toy Story in 199
5--and all the films in between have been critical and commercial successes.

Up doesn't feature any robots or talking cars, no Buzz Lightyear or a rat who w
ants to be a cook, but it does have a grumpy old man who has just lost his wife
 and an over-eager young Asian-American wilderness explorer. That brings us to 
the movie's main strengths: the simple yet resounding plot that connects emotio
nally with adults and the great animation work to which children can easily res
pond.

Up tells the tale of aging Carl Fredericksen (voiced by Ed Asner, known for his
 role in the '70s TV sitcom, Mary Tyler Moore), a widower who is relegated to l
iving out his years in his simple home. Times are changing around him, but his 
memories are firmly fixed on the life he led with his beloved wife Ellie, and t
heir one unfulfilled dream:to travel to Paradise Falls in South America.

His self-imposed hibernation is disturbed in the form of young Russell (voiced 
by newcomer Jordan Nagai), a "wilderness explorer" (think Boy Scout) who needs 
a badge for "assisting the elderly" to complete his training. Carl and Russell 
then embark on the adventure of their lives--for Carl, to fulfill his promise t
o his beloved, and for Russell, to fulfill his training. Carl is the father tha
t Russell rarely sees, while Russell is the son that Carl never had.

Without giving away too many plot details, the movie sends out a basic message:
 it's never too late to follow your dreams. While this may seem corny, Pixar's 
animation is so evocative that it is able to deliver this timeless message with
out live action. One of the great moments in the movie is a silent montage that
 tells the love story of Carl and Ellie, which will bring tears to your eyes.

In these complicated times filled with complicated films, Up is a straightforwa
rd, uncomplicated, and heartfelt movie that will refresh and uplift, as evidenc
ed by the ovation it received from the audience I watched it with as the credit
s rolled. See this with the love of your life, your family, or even by yourself
.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Review: Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/06/03/review-night-at-the-museum-battle-of-the-smithsonian/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10351</id>

    <published>2009-06-03T03:10:02Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:22Z</updated>

    <summary>By Clarence Yu BEN Stiller returns with the usual suspects in this enjoyable second installmen t of the Night at the Museum series. The film&apos;s basic strength is its appeal to both adults and children and the ensemble cast of...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>By Clarence Yu
</strong>

BEN Stiller returns with the usual suspects in this enjoyable second installmen
t of the <em>Night at the Museum</em> series.  The film's basic strength is its
 appeal to both adults and children and the ensemble cast of terrific character
 actors.

The plot is quite simple--the museum characters face extinction, and Stiller's 
mission is to save them. Stiller's strength has always been to play the regular
 guy caught up in an irregular situation, and he demonstrates this again in the
 movie.

The film's main surprise is Amy Adams, who plays Amelia Earhart. She lights up 
the screen with a confidence evocative of the "can do" woman, and plays the mai
n foil to Stiller's everyday man.

However, this film just does not stand up as well as the first one. While the f
irst had a more balanced blend of appeal to both children and adults and had mo
re time for character development, <em>Battle of the Smithsonian</em> seems to 
focus more on toilet comedy and quick laughs.

It also suffers from trying to squeeze in the talents of Robin Williams, Hank A
zaria, Owen Wilson, and Christopher Guest, among others, in less than two hours
. Focusing on one specific character is quite hard to do without diluting the o
thers, and this happens when most of the attention is focused on the talented A
zaria.

Also, much missed are the talents of Carla Gugino, whose character disappears w
ithout any notice.  Sorely underused are the funny Ricky Gervais and the always
 dependable Owen Wilson.

One thing can be said about the Night at the Museum series thus far: While it m
ay be a poor attempt to educate viewers about history, it can serve as a good s
tarting point for kids to arouse their interest in it.

History buffs and purists may disagree, but in this day and age of Nintendo and
 Playstation holding the attention of children of all ages the world over, this
 movie is a boon.  Hopefully, the kids who watch this film will get interested 
in, say, the real Amelia Earhart, by the great on-screen portrayal of Amy Adams
, or try to find out more about the real Napoleon Bonaparte or what Ivan the Te
rrible really did.

<em>Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian </em>stands up better compar
ed to the overly pretentious "re-boots" currently in release.  Kids of all ages
 will still get laughs and kicks out of this one. Take your family with you whe
n you can.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Star Trek: The Future Begins</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/05/07/star-trek-the-future-begins/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10350</id>

    <published>2009-05-07T05:43:24Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:22Z</updated>

    <summary>Izah Morales INQUIRER.net MANILA, PhilippinesââWhat path should I follow?â This seems to be the recurring theme in the latest episode of âStar Trek: The F uture Begins,â which tells the stories of each young crew of USS Kelvin Enterpr ise....</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[Izah Morales
INQUIRER.net
 
MANILA, PhilippinesââWhat path should I follow?â

This seems to be the recurring theme in the latest episode of âStar Trek: The F
uture Begins,â which tells the stories of each young crew of USS Kelvin Enterpr
ise.  

We see a young Spock (Zachary Quinto)--who is confused about his half-human, ha
lf-Vulcan roots--taking a path that would later shape his life as an adult.

Spock joins James Kirk (Chris Pine), Uhura (Zo Saldana), McCoy (Karl Urban), Su
lu (John Cho) and Chekov (Anton Yelchin) in a maiden voyage to stop Romulan Ner
oâs vengeful attack on the United Federation of Planets. In the process, the âb
attleâ also takes place among the crew whose friendships and leaderships are te
sted.

<!--more-->Quinto, popularly known in his role as âSylarâ in the hit television
 series âHeroes,â plays a more scholarly and stiff character in Spock. With the
 signature Vulcanâs husk-like haircut, Quinto takes on an emotionless character
, similar to Sylar, but minus the ruthlessness that we see in the TV series. 

Among trekkies, Vulcans are known as logical beings who rarely display emotion.
 Their life is decided by reason. Yet, it is Spockâs half-human nature that mak
es him yearn for loveâagain similar to his character in Heroes.

Pine, on the other hand, takes on the role of the young and happy-go-lucky Kirk
. But as events unfold, the boy matures into a responsible man.

Another noteworthy character Chekov, the 17-year-old genius, steals some scenes
 from the protagonists. The quirky Chekov, played by Russian actor Yelchin, sur
prisingly provides the movie with some welcome humor.

Directed by J.J. Abrams of the âMission: Impossible III,â âLost,â âAlias,â Star
 Trek: The Future Begins provides a good mix of action and drama. However, the 
love angle is somehow forced and is not given much explanation and detail, whic
h might leave viewers asking for more. 

For trekkies, this movie is definitely stunning and sometimes visually overwhel
mingâa signature of J.J. Abrams-directed films. But as far as Star Trek movies 
are concerned, this a big improvement from previous attemptsâconsidering the po
werhouse production led by Abrams.

As the familiar introduction in the TV series goes, this movie will take you to
 a new âfinal frontier.â 

Star Trek: The Future Begins is a movie by Paramount Pictures.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Review: 17 Again</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/05/04/review-17-again/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10349</id>

    <published>2009-05-04T06:18:49Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:22Z</updated>

    <summary>By Clarence Yu 17 Again tells the story of Mike O&apos;Donnell (Matthew Perry/Zac Efron) w ho, at the age of 37, finds himself regretting the choices he made when he was in High School. He is unhappy with the way...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>By Clarence Yu</strong>

<em>17 Again </em>tells the story of Mike O'Donnell (Matthew Perry/Zac Efron) w
ho, at the age of 37, finds himself regretting the choices he made when he was 
in High School. He is unhappy with the way his life has turned out and is in th
e middle of a divorce with his once beloved wife.

Wishing that he were back in high school again, Mike soon finds himself transfo
rmed back to his young self, however, it is still the present day, and he has n
ot gone back in time. What follows next is a predictable storyline that sets th
e stage for a series of events that makes Mike realize that he should have been
 happy with what he had.

<!--more-->17 is one of those typical body-switching comedies in the vein of Bi
g, Vice Versa and Peggy Sue Got Married. The laughs come and go, and the movie 
is both well produced and directed (Burr Steers helmed the feature).
Matthew Perry is underutilized as the elder Mike; Leslie Mann is lovely as Mike
's wife, but the real scene stealers are Mike's best friend Ned Gold, played by
 Thomas Lennon, and Principal Masterson played by Melora Hardin.  Their interpl
ay is fantastic; the scenes involving the romance between the two are absolutel
y hilarious and are worth the price of the ticket if you aren't into teen comed
ies.

Zac Efron begins his non-singing/dancing lead career here in this movie, and fo
r starters, that is something fresh. Efron displays a beautiful, almost effemin
ate star quality that teens swoon over. He carries out his dialogue effectively
, but you can still see that it will take a couple of more roles to push his st
ar into real leading man power. One is reminded of Rob Lowe during his early ro
les in the '80s.  At this point in his career, Efron gives off the sense that h
e is going to need a gang to elevate his star power, much like the Brat Pack be
fore him, that he isn't going to be able to survive based upon his six pack alo
ne.

In the end, 17 Again may not be a landmark movie by any measure, but it doesn't
 really pretend to be one.  Even if it is just milking the box office cow by ca
pitalizing on Zac Efron's celebrity, it has good morals to tell, and with the a
udience that it is targeting, that is something that is always good to see. Bri
ng your kids to this one.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Hugh Laurie plays &apos;Dr. Cockroach, Ph.D.&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/03/18/hugh-laurie-plays-dr-cockroach-phd/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10347</id>

    <published>2009-03-18T11:42:54Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:22Z</updated>

    <summary>HUGH Laurie, yes of &quot;H ouse,&quot; will be doing the voice &quot;Dr. Cockroach, Ph.D.&quot; in DreamWorksâ latest ani mation film &quot;Monsters vs. Aliens.&quot; Director Rob Letterman recalls why they chose Laurie to play the part: âWe want ed somebody to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/drc
ockroach1.jpg" title="drcockroach1.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.inquirer.net/cou
chpotatoes/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/drcockroach1.jpg" alt="drcockroach1.jpg" 
style="border-width: 1px; margin-top: 5px; float: left; width: 285px; margin-ri
ght: 10px; height: 164px" width="285" height="164" /></a>HUGH Laurie, yes of "H
ouse," will be doing the voice "Dr. Cockroach, Ph.D." in DreamWorksâ latest ani
mation film "Monsters vs. Aliens."

Director Rob Letterman recalls why they chose Laurie to play the part: âWe want
ed somebody to be very formal and erudite, because we thought that would be a g
reat contrast with the whole âcockroach badâ thing. And so, we immediately thou
ght of Hugh. And a lot of people donât realize, at least people in the States, 
that heâs a Brit. Hugh Laurie is obviously mostly known in the States for âHous
e,â but he is a famous actor for many years in England. He did âThe Black Adder
â [television series] with Rowan Atkinson and heâs an incredible comedic actor.
 We were fans of his prior to âHouse.â So it was very fortunate to have him on 
the movie.â

Dr. Cockroach is a brilliant scientist who turned himself into a cockroach as a
 result of a self-experiment gone awry. With his lifeâs work confiscated, the d
octor spends his time locked up, working on something diabolical.

âFirst of all, I love doing animated projects. You wear your own clothes. I lov
e the freedom of messing around and trying to create something in a voice. Itâs
 exciting and a fun challenge. But also, now these animated films have sort of 
really become the summit of modern entertainment,â Laurie says, referring to hi
s role as Dr. Cockroach, Ph.D.

<!--more-->Director Vernon remembers the first time they met Laurie. âWhen we m
et with him, he had this look on his face, like, âWhy are you guys talking to m
e right now?â We toured him around the DreamWorks Animation campus, and wound u
p in the editing room, showing him storyboard sequences of the film. We talked 
casually and really hit it off. He said, âYesâ on the spot! Once he got in the 
booth, he did not disappoint.â

Laurie adds: âAfter a lovely tour around the place, I was presented with this m
assive amount, almost like a museum, of artwork that theyâd already composedâ¦t
o start to get a sense I suppose, for their benefit and for prospective actors 
or designers and so on of the world they were trying to create. I was immediate
ly entranced by that wonderful â50s feel, which is not only wonderfully relevan
t to the style of story they were trying to tell, but it also was a great perio
d of American design. I was sold as soon as I walked in through the door. I did
nât tell them that, of course. I hemmed and hawed and stroked my chin and I tri
ed to play hard to get, but I was in for a ride from word âGoââ.
Laurie currently stars in FOXâs medical drama âHouse.â He has already won two G
olden Globe Awards, a Screen Actors Guild Award and an Emmy Award playing the a
nti-social and brutally honest doctor Dr. Gregory House.

âMonsters Vs. Aliensâ will be shown in theaters on March 27.

It is released and distributed by United International Pictures through Solar E
ntertainment Corp.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>American Idol Watch: Adam Lambert</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/03/13/american-idol-watch-adam-lambert/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10346</id>

    <published>2009-03-13T07:04:53Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:20Z</updated>

    <summary>Are we looking at another &quot;David Cook&quot; in the making in Season 8&apos;s American Ido l? In his per formance of Michael Jackson&apos;s Black or White, Adam Lambert unraveled the &quot;whole package&quot; which indeed impressed Paula Abdul. She even predicted...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[Are we looking at another "David Cook" in the making in Season 8's American Ido
l?

In his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_mqbc9COK8" target="_blank">per
formance</a> of Michael Jackson's Black or White, <a href="http://www.americani
dol.com/videos/season_8/the_top_13_finalists/top_13_adam_lambert" target="_blan
k">Adam Lambert</a> unraveled the "whole package" which indeed impressed Paula 
Abdul. She even predicted that this young singer--who can really hit the high n
otes--would be "running all the way to the top."

What do you think?]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Slamdunk for Slumdog Millionaire</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/02/23/slamdunk-for-slumdog-millionaire/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10345</id>

    <published>2009-02-23T04:56:02Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:20Z</updated>

    <summary>Slumdog Mil lionaire wins! Hauling a total of eight awards, this movie about a slum dweller turned millionaire dominat es this year&apos;s Academy Awards. It took home the best Directing (Danny Boyle), S ong (&quot;Jai Ho&quot;), Musical Score, Film Editing,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.oscars.com/oscarnight/winners/" target="_blank">Slumdog Mil
lionaire</a> wins!

Hauling a total of eight awards, this <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1010
048/" target="_blank">movie</a> about a slum dweller turned millionaire dominat
es this year's Academy Awards. It took home the best Directing (Danny Boyle), S
ong ("Jai Ho"), Musical Score, Film Editing, Sound Mixing, Cinematography, Adap
ted Screenplay (Simon Beaufoy of "Full Monty") and of course, Best Picture. Tha
t's eight out of 10 nominations (including two nominations for best Song).

Directed by Danny Boyle and Loveleen Tandan (co-director in India), Slumdog Mil
lionaire was shot in Mumbai. Adapted from a novel written by Vikas Swarup,Â  th
e movie juxtaposes reality and fantasy, pain and suffering with joy and love. Y
es, it's a love story but with a twist.

Slumdog Millionaire has been hauling awards from other award-giving bodies (inc
luding 7 awards from BAFTA and four from the Golden Globes), and has been antic
ipated as a big winner in this year's Oscars.

If you haven't watched the film, here's a brief summary of the story from Fox S
earchlight Pictures:
<blockquote>The story of Jamal Malik (Dev Patel), an 18 year-old orphan from th
e slums of Mumbai, who is about to experience the biggest day of his life. With
 the whole nation watching, he is just one question away from winning a stagger
ing 20 million rupees on India's "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?" But when the 
show breaks for the night, police arrest him on suspicion of cheating; how coul
d a street kid know so much? Desperate to prove his innocence, Jamal tells the 
story of his life in the slum where he and his brother grew up, of their advent
ures together on the road, of vicious encounters with local gangs, and of Latik
a (Freida Pinto), the girl he loved and lost. Each chapter of his story reveals
 the key to the answer to one of the game show's questions. Each chapter of Jam
al's increasingly layered story reveals where he learned the answers to the sho
w's seemingly impossible quizzes. But one question remains a mystery: what is t
his young man with no apparent desire for riches really doing on the game show?
 When the new day dawns and Jamal returns to answer the final question, the Ins
pector and sixty million viewers are about to find out. At the heart of its sto
rytelling lies the question of how anyone comes to know the things they know ab
out life and love.</blockquote>
Here's another interesting <a href="http://goldderby.latimes.com/awards_goldder
by/2009/02/live-blogging-t.html" target="_blank">liveblog from the Oscars</a>. 
Check it out.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Liveblogging Oscars</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/02/23/liveblogging-oscars/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10344</id>

    <published>2009-02-23T02:28:26Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:20Z</updated>

    <summary>SLAMDUNK FOR SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE WINS. Steven Speilberg introduces the nominees for best picture. +++ So far, Slumdog Millionaire has hauled six awards including best in Directing +++ Sean Penn wins for his role in Milk. Penn acknowledges fellow nominee Mickey...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[SLAMDUNK FOR SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE WINS.

Steven Speilberg introduces the nominees for best picture.

+++

So far, Slumdog Millionaire has hauled six awards including best in Directing

+++

Sean Penn wins for his role in Milk. Penn acknowledges fellow nominee Mickey Ro
urke who played an aging wrestler in The Wrestler.

+++

We're now hearing all the best actor nominees being introduced by fellow best a
ctor winners...

+++

So far, here are the <a href="http://www.oscars.com/oscarnight/winners/" target
="_blank">winners of the 81st Academy Awards.</a>

+++

Kate Winslet wins!

+++
Quotable quote from Ben Stiller doing a Joaquin Phoenix: "Slumdog was totally s
hot on a cellphone."

+++
Slumdog Millionaire wins best adopted screenplay. Before that Milk get the orig
inal screeplay award.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Oscars: Penelope wins supporting actress</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/02/23/oscars-penelope-wins-supporting-actress/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10343</id>

    <published>2009-02-23T02:08:36Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:19Z</updated>

    <summary> by Paula Bustamante Agence France-Presse HOLLYWOOD--Penelope Cruz created a piece of Hollywood history here on Sunday af ter becoming the first Spanish actress to win an Oscar for her performance in t he Woody Allen comedy &quot;Vicky Cristina Barcelona.&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[ <strong>by Paula Bustamante
Agence France-Presse</strong>

HOLLYWOOD--Penelope Cruz created a piece of Hollywood history here on Sunday af
ter becoming the first Spanish actress to win an Oscar for her performance in t
he Woody Allen comedy "Vicky Cristina Barcelona."

The 34-year-old's victory in the supporting actress category represented a glit
tering recognition of an acting talent that has seen her appear in two Oscar-wi
nning foreign language movies.

However it was her scene-stealing performance as Maria Elena, the neurotic wife
 of an artist, in Allen's steamy Barcelona-set comedy that finally saw her stri
ke Oscars gold.

Born in Madrid in 1974, Cruz appeared destined for a career in the entertainmen
t industry almost as soon as she could walk. As a child she entertained family 
members by mimicking popular television commercials.

<!--more-->Her initial creative outlet was dancing however, and she was soon en
rolled at Spain's National Conservatory where she studied classical ballet for 
nine years. At 15 however, she was nudged towards acting after beating 300 othe
r girls to win a contract.

That led to a string of roles in Spanish television shows as well as music vide
os, and before long she was acting in full-fledged feature films.

Her breakthrough performance came in Spanish director Bigas Luna's "Jamon, Jamo
n" in 1992, which received critical acclaim and was notable for its erotic scen
es featuring a 16-year-old Cruz and Javier Bardem.

That was followed soon afterwards by "Belle Epoque," which went on to win the O
scar for best foreign film, Cruz playing the role of one of four sisters vying 
for the love of an army deserter.

The next major milestone in Cruz's career however came in 1997, when she was ca
st in her first film by Pedro Almodovar.

"Live Flesh" marked the beginning of a decade-long collaboration between Almodo
var and the actress which has included roles in another foreign language Oscar-
winner, 1999's "All About My Mother," and "Volver."

"Working for Pedro was my dream, I was obsessed with him," Cruz said. "My bigge
st dream ever was receiving his telephone call."

While Cruz has achieved critical success in Spanish-language films, she has fou
nd it harder to establish herself in mainstream Hollywood.

She achieved a rare but unwanted feat in 2001 when she received three nominatio
ns in the "Golden Raspberries" Oscars spoof, which salute the film world's "wor
st of the worst," in a single year.

Cruz earned Razzies for "Captain Corelli's Mandolin," "Blow," and "Vanilla Sky,
" a film which saw her star opposite Tom Cruise, who was to become her boyfrien
d for three years.

Cruz has yet to score a genuine box-office hit in English, with recent flops in
cluding "Gothika" and "Sahara."

However she reminded everyone of her talents -- and picked up an Oscar nominati
on to boot -- with 2006's "Volver."

The fiercely independent Cruz, who has been romantically linked to compatriot a
nd "Jamon Jamon" co-star Bardem, is also wary of being type-cast simply for her
 striking physical beauty.

"The most difficult thing in the world is to start a career known only for your
 looks, and then to try to become a serious actress," she says. "No one will ta
ke you seriously once you are known as the pretty woman."]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>REVIEW: Frost/Nixon: shrewd mix of comedy, politics</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/02/17/review-frostnixon-shrewd-mix-of-comedy-politics/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10342</id>

    <published>2009-02-17T08:45:55Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:19Z</updated>

    <summary>By Clarence Yu Contributor DIRECTOR Ron Howard has once again proven his mettle with his latest Academy-no minated effort, Frost/Nixon. Based on the London and Broadway plays of the same name, Michael Sheen (The Queen) and Frank Langella (Dave) reprise...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>By Clarence Yu
Contributor
</strong>

DIRECTOR Ron Howard has once again proven his mettle with his latest Academy-no
minated effort, Frost/Nixon. Based on the London and Broadway plays of the same
 name, Michael Sheen (The Queen) and Frank Langella (Dave) reprise their roles 
as David Frost and Richard M. Nixon.

While not as seriously dramatic as Oliver Stone's Nixon, the film is a great an
d successful attempt at educating and entertaining audiences on a particular pi
ece of celluloid history that has become the stuff of legend for political junk
ies, the infamous Nixon interviews that took place in 1977.

Michael Sheen plays David Frost as the talk show/television host who yearns for
 more credibility and fame, and Frank Langella gives a powerhouse performance a
s the disgraced President Nixon who, well, wants his credibility and fame resto
red.

It is the comedy of it all that makes the film work. Witness the film's first h
our or so and you will find that the film does not attempt to be serious politi
cal drama but rather a behind-the-scenes look at how Frost tries to set up an i
nterview with Nixon. A passionate James Reston, Jr. played by Sam Rockwell, liv
ens up the comedy even more.

Kevin Bacon surprisingly brings in a watered down performance as Nixon's chief 
of staff Jack Brennan as he doesn't really bring anything refreshing to the fil
m.

The film notably highlights Richard Nixon's political skill and the ethics of c
heckbook journalism. Small details such as several surprised looks on Frostâs f
ace and the irresistible personal charm of Frank Langella's Nixon are exploded 
onto the screen with such vividness that I could not help but laugh at it all. 
Whether this is intended or not, these help propel the film from a mere politic
al film to something really worth watching. I haven't seen the play but I think
 that Ron Howard has been successful in this transposition from stage to screen
.

The youth of today are encouraged to see this film to get a glimpse of how it w
as back then before reality TV and how deeply America was scarred by the only r
esignation of a President in office. Hopefully one day, Bill Clinton's scandals
 can be rightfully made into a film in the same vein.

A word of caution however--all must be taken in context. David Frost went on to
 become somewhat of a more serious journalist, finally earning a knighthood, an
d Richard M. Nixon became a somewhat respected elder statesman in his later yea
rs before finally passing away in 1994.

Finally, Frank Langella's performance as Nixon rightfully deserves its Oscar no
mination. He doesn't look anything like Nixon, but by the end of this highly en
tertaining movie, you are convinced. Anything but boring, this movie is a must 
see.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Review: &apos;Taken&apos; takes us by surprise</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/02/05/review-taken-takes-us-by-surprise/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10341</id>

    <published>2009-02-05T10:32:51Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:19Z</updated>

    <summary>By Clarence Yu Contributor I donât know who you are. I donât know what you want. If you are l ooking for ransom, I can tell you I donât have money, but what I do have is a p articular...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>By Clarence Yu
Contributor
</strong>
<blockquote> I donât know who you are. I donât know what you want. If you are l
ooking for ransom, I can tell you I donât have money, but what I do have is a p
articular set of skills. Skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills
 that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you let my daughter go now, t
hat will be the end of it. I will not look for you, I will not pursue you. But 
if you donât, I will look for you. I will find you. And I will kill you.</block
quote>
WITH these few lines of dialogue, the stage is set for Taken. You pretty much k
now where you are going to end up as you step into the theater. But this is a k
ind of movie where you want to go along for the ride nonetheless.

Directed by Pierre Morel, Taken stars Liam Neeson as Bryan Mills, presumably an
 ex-government agent who retired in California to live close to his daughter. H
e wanted to make up for all the lost time while he was away on active duty.

Mills is a loving father who is estranged from his wife (Famke Janssen) but wan
ts to be there for his daughter.

<!--more-->When his daughter decides to go on a trip to Paris, that is the time
 when things change. The retired agent springs back into action to rescue his o
wn kin. That is basically the premise and the story of the entire movie and hun
dreds of other action movies before this.

The notion of Neeson playing action hero--with all these gun-toting, car-chasin
g, thrashing actions and assassinations (think James Bond)-- is quite dubious. 
It leaves a big question mark in my mind. Make no mistake. There is no question
 about Neeson's acting capabilities. But one has to see films like Michael Coll
ins, Rob Roy and Love Actually to know that this is an actor who is certainly o
ne of the best at his craft--the kind of character actor who seems to be Shakes
pearean-trained.

So to find out that Mr. Neeson stars in a relatively generic action movie will 
catch some people by surprise. Thankfully, this wall-to-wall action film is sal
vaged by Neeson's dignified presence. And those first lines of dialogue could n
ot have been uttered with more seriousness or authority than Neeson himself.

The action is also not that bad. It never stops as you are kept to the edge of 
your seat, thanks to the script and production by Luc Besson of the Transporter
 series fame.

But it would be hard to imagine watching this film in the hands of a less capab
le actor than Liam Neeson. And to think that audiences would have had to wait f
or 2011 for his rumored portrayal of Abraham Lincoln in collaboration with Stev
en Spielberg.

Taken is definitely worth watching for both the action and the lead actor. Liam
 Neeson has proven that he, too, can take up the mantle of an action hero and g
ive others a run for their money. If you are tired of seeing plot-twisted actio
n movies that leave you scratching your head while you long for a straight-ahea
d action film, see this soon.

See the movie's trailer <a href="http://www.takenmovie.com/" target="_blank">he
re</a>.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Review: &quot;W&quot; Isnât So Bad After All</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/02/03/review-w-isnat-so-bad-after-all/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10340</id>

    <published>2009-02-03T04:07:12Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:19Z</updated>

    <summary>By Clarence Yu Contributor SOMETIME ago when I heard that Oliver Stone was making a biopic of President Ge orge W. Bush, something just didn&apos;t feel right inside my stomach. After all, wh at else can you expect from the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>By Clarence Yu
Contributor
</strong>
SOMETIME ago when I heard that Oliver Stone was making a biopic of President Ge
orge W. Bush, something just didn't feel right inside my stomach. After all, wh
at else can you expect from the director extraordinaire who brought us Nixon, J
FK and Platoon, among other films? Then maybe I thought he had a conspiracy the
ory thing going on, which would shed light on what really happened these past e
ight years. 

Then I read initial reviews about the film--it was indeed a true-to-life biopic
, so how could one get serious with it? Turns out, there are plenty of reasons.

History will probably judge George W. Bush as one of the worst presidents ever,
 and, at best, one of the most controversial. Stone however, doesn't want us to
 have any more of that. We know it. We've been seeing the news, reading the pap
ers, and watching all the comedians. Instead, he gives us George W., the frat a
nd party boy, the alcoholic turned born-again Christian, the man who for the mo
st part of his life stood in his fatherâs shadow.

<!--more-->As President, George W. is on the eve of the Iraq War. The movie the
n goes back to his initiation rites as a frat man at Yale. Throughout the whole
 film this back-and-forth device works wonderfully to emphasize just what exact
ly he might have been thinking, or what could have influenced his thinking, whe
n he started the decision making path into the war. 

Josh Brolin is in fine form as the title character. Though not exactly dead-on 
humorous as, say, Will Ferrell, Brolin is able to capture the mixture of innoce
nce, swagger, and phallic confidence that the real George W. so often displays.
 The ensemble cast includes Thandie Newton as Condoleezza Rice, Richard Dreyfus
s as Dick Cheney, and Scott Glenn as Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. All wer
e great but not exceptional, James Cromwell included, as George H. W. Bush.

This is not a movie you would like to treasure in the same vein as Nixon or Bor
n On The Fourth of July, but it definitely showcases, with alarming frankness, 
the state of affairs in the White House during that period, and with some tende
rness, the struggles that George W. did have to go through in life before becom
ing President.

No doubts however. Stone did not make a movie to explain or defend President Ge
orge W. Bush. He cleverly uses his life story as a backdrop to show audiences t
hat he too, can make an ordinary, clever movie. Try to catch this in theaters.

Watch this trailer:
<object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.
com/v/sg7vwicPx98&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true
"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="ht
tp://www.youtube.com/v/sg7vwicPx98&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-fl
ash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"
></embed></object>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>(UPDATED) Twists and turns in Heroes Season 3</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/01/29/updated-twists-and-turns-in-heroes-season-3/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10339</id>

    <published>2009-01-29T06:36:02Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:18Z</updated>

    <summary>Editor&apos;s note: This is to correct an earlier version since Season 3 , Volume 4 of Heroes--which will run 12 more episodes, is scheduled to air on F ebruary 2 to April 20). Thanks to our readers for pointing this...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[<em><strong>Editor's note: This is to correct an earlier version since Season 3
, Volume 4 of Heroes--which will run 12 more episodes, is scheduled to air on F
ebruary 2 to April 20). Thanks to our readers for pointing this out. We apologi
ze for the confusion. </strong></em>

<strong>By Marjorie Gorospe
INQUIRER.net</strong>

IF you have extraordinary powers, would you rather become a hero or a villain?

Throughout the third season of Heroes, that dilemma has been the recurring them
e. Heroes turned villains. Villains turned heroes. As some heroes desired for m
ore power, some went astray. It was now a question of, âAre you one of us, or o
ne of them.â

As the saying goes, power corrupts. Now, having extraordinary powers, one can b
e eventually lured to the dark side. In the past seasons, Peter Petrelli has be
en undoing things his brother Nathan Petrelli had done. But in doing so, he has
 been changing the future (not once, but many times). Despite his purest intent
ions, Peter has continued to play god in first half of the Season 3, traveling 
through time and deleting events that he hope would change the future. But as h
is mother Angela Petrelli would keep reminding him, there are consequences.

<!--more-->Enter Mohinder Suresh. Just like Peter, he has the purest of intenti
ons. He is searching for the answers to what gives people superhuman abilities.
 But Suresh finds himself in a quandary. He too desires power, partly because h
e is angry and curious. His pursuit of science blinds him. Eventually, his self
-interest takes over. This leads him to a path, which he most fearedâthe same p
ath that Sylar has takenâa killer.

Meanwhile, we have Nathan Petrelli. (Remember, Season 2 ended with an unknown a
ssailant who shot him in public while he was about to reveal his true identity)
. Season 3 opens with the changed Nathan Petrelli. His humbling experienceâand 
supposed death has somehow changed his perspective in life. But he soon found o
ut that it was Peter who shot him and now heâs in the same dilemma. Eventually,
 his desire to run the most powerful country in the world made him surrender to
 the evil plans of father Arthur Petrelli (who was earlier known to be dead) an
d Nancy Strauss (who was the twin sister of Nikki Sanders who died in Season 2)
.

Volume 3 of Season 3 ends with Nathan giving away the secrets of the Heroes to 
the highest ranking official of the country. According to reports, Volume 4 of 
Season 3, which is called "Fugitives," will unravel more stories in the next fe
w weeks.

Sylar is perhaps the biggest surprise so far. From a hated villain, Sylar becom
es one of the âheroes,â as he discovers his true nature and his supposed real p
arents. To complicate matters, he even partners with Noah Bennet, adoptive fath
er of Claire Bennet, the cheerleader. In Season 2, both characters were on diff
erent sides of the fence.

As I watched the first half of Season 3, I found several lessons but one that s
truck me is about giving people second chances. Sylar was given a second chance
, to turn away from his craving for othersâ power. He even fell in love. In the
 end, Sylarâs attempt to turn away from evil fails.

Now, I just canât wait to see the continuation of Season 3 for more twists and 
turns in this TV series by Tim Kring.

Watch this teaser:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.
com/v/k-LnxJ2jxYQ&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true
"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="ht
tp://www.youtube.com/v/k-LnxJ2jxYQ&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-fl
ash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"
></embed></object>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Review: Storytelling shines in &apos;Vicky Cristina Barcelona&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/01/27/review-storytelling-shines-in-vicky-cristina-barcelona/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10338</id>

    <published>2009-01-27T10:52:27Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:18Z</updated>

    <summary>Lawrence Casiraya INQUIRER.net I seem have a natural attraction for Woody Allen movies. Maybe because they rea ffirm my faith in the one ingredient I deem important in a movie: the story. &quot;Vicky Cristina Barcelona&quot; is a typical Woody Allen...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>Lawrence Casiraya
INQUIRER.net</strong>

I seem have a natural attraction for Woody Allen movies. Maybe because they rea
ffirm my faith in the one ingredient I deem important in a movie: the story.

"Vicky Cristina Barcelona" is a typical Woody Allen film, meaning there's alway
s a cast of characters and it ultimately explores human relationships.

This time it's a love triangle--Barcelona is a metaphor, of course. Meaning the
re should be sex involved and that Scarlett Johannson is somehow part of it.

<!--more-->She is Woody Allen's muse at present (Match Point, Scoop) but to me 
Rebecca Allen (as Vicky) played her role better and with much more depth.

Which is not to deny Ms. Johannson's irrepressible qualities; she only needs to
 purse her pouty lips. It was even more fun to watch Penelope Cruz as the fiery
 and muy caliente ex-wife to Javier Bardem.

Overall, the story becomes interesting and amusing enough without becoming friv
olous.

The movie won Best Picture award (for comedy) at the recent Golden Globes. To m
e, Mr. Allen redeems himself with better storytelling this time than Cassandra'
s Dream, his most recent work I saw.

After which I still keep my faith in the power of film to tell a simple story w
ithout the razzle dazzle typical of so-called Hollywood blockbusters.

Watch the film's trailer here:

<embed src="http://www.metacafe.com/fplayer/1627940/vicky_cristina_barcelona_mo
vie_trailer_review.swf" width="400" height="345" wmode="transparent" pluginspag
e="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-f
lash" allowFullScreen="true"> </embed><br><font size = 1><a href="http://www.me
tacafe.com/watch/1627940/vicky_cristina_barcelona_movie_trailer_review/">Vicky 
Cristina Barcelona Movie Trailer Review</a> - <a href="http://www.metacafe.com/
">Awesome video clips here</a></font>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&apos;Star Trek&apos; creator and wife&apos;s ashes rocketing to deep space</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/2009/01/27/star-trek-creator-and-wifes-ashes-rocketing-to-deep-space/" />
    <id>tag:blogs.inquirer.net,2009:/couchpotatoes//33.10337</id>

    <published>2009-01-27T04:21:43Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-08T11:33:18Z</updated>

    <summary>Agence France-Presse SAN FRANCISCO--Ashes of &quot;Star Trek&quot; creator Gene Roddenberry and his actress wi fe will blast toward the far reaches of the cosmos in keeping with the show&apos;s f amed opening line &quot;Space, the final frontier.&quot; Majel Roddenberry died...</summary>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.inquirer.net/couchpotatoes/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>Agence France-Presse
</strong>
SAN FRANCISCO--Ashes of "Star Trek" creator Gene Roddenberry and his actress wi
fe will blast toward the far reaches of the cosmos in keeping with the show's f
amed opening line "Space, the final frontier."

Majel Roddenberry died in December, two months before her 77th birthday, and wi
ll posthumously fulfill a "dream of journeying through space with her husband,"
 according to Celestis Inc, the US company behind the memorial flight.

Celestis sent some of Gene Roddenberry's ashes into orbit around the earth in a
 premier Founders Flight rocket launch in 1997.

Gene Roddenberry died six years earlier with a wish to explore space in keeping
 with characters in his adventure television show that first aired in the late 
1960s and still has a strong cult following.

<!--more-->The rifle-cartridge sized canister of ashes, along with the remains 
of others onboard the rocket, was ostensibly burned into oblivion as it re-ente
red Earth's atmosphere.

"We are deeply honored to have flown Gene on our first mission, and to be entru
sted by the Roddenberry family to fulfill Majel's dream of flying in space with
 her husband," said Celestis president Charles Chafer.

A launch date has yet to be determined.

Majel Roddenberry was remembered as "The First Lady of Star Trek" due to her cl
ose relationship to her husband and roles in many "Star Trek" film and televisi
on episodes.

She played Nurse Chapel in the "Star Trek" television shows and had parts in ot
her classic programs including "Leave it to Beaver" and "The Lucy Show."

"Star Trek" fans can visit the Celestis.com website to submit messages to accom
pany the couple into space.

"Celestis will be fulfilling a pledge made to my mother in 1995," said the coup
le's son, Eugene Roddenberry.

"To launch both my mother and father together, side by side, and carry their sp
irits, memories, and the message of their life's work into the cosmos on an inf
inite journey into deep space."

The ashes of "Star Trek" actor James Doohan, who played the USS Enterprise's ch
ief engineer Montgomery "Scotty" Scott, were sent into space in April 2007.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

