Quantcast

5 is to 1

06/27/08

Posted under US relations

Official photo and caption:

ph1-062608.jpg

STANDING OVATION FOR PGMA — President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo receives a standing ovation at the reception of the Philippine-US Friendship Caucus at the Veterans Committee Hearing Room, Cannon House Office Building at the US Capitol Complex on Independence Avenue, Washington D.C. this morning (Wednesday, Washington time). Directly behind the President is Rep. John Filner while at right is Rep. Darrel Issa, two of the leading supporters of the Filipino veterans bill in the US House of Representatives. Aside from Filner and Issa, eight other US congressmen attended the reception. Also shown are some of the Filipino officials and World War II veterans. (Rodolfo Manabat-OPS/NIB Photo)

That’s 10 U.S. Congressmen versus 52 Filipino Congressmen who accompanied the President on her trip (give or take a couple of last-minute cancellations). A 5:1 ratio.

Powered by Gregarious (21)

Bringing home the genetically-modified bacon

06/26/08

Posted under US relations

There’s something about the slap-dash nature of the Palace propaganda corps that bugs me. Take the caption for this official photo:

ph1-062508.jpg

Official caption: US-RP AGRI ACCORD–Washington DC.–President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo watches approvingly as Agriculture Secretary Arthur Yap shakes hands with US Agriculture Secretary Edward Schaefer after the two signed a Framework of Agreement and Cooperation on Agricultural-Related Fields between RP Department of Agriculture and the US Department of Agriculture this afternoon (Washington time) at the Federal Suite of the “Willard Hotel in Washington DC. Also in photo is Foreign Affairs Secretary Alberto Romulo (2nd from left).

Well what’s wrong with it? First of all, it’s Schefer, not Schaefer; and while I think the simpler explanation for the gobbledygook in the caption above -what is a “Framework of Agreement and Cooperation on Agricultural-Related Fields”- is that the caption writer was clueless when it came to what was being signed or its relative importance, there’s also the possibility the whole photo-op will be less milk-able if the public actually knew what the two cabinet members had just signed.

The Americans are less opaque about these things though, than we are. So, see the US Department of Agriculture’s own press release:

Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer today signed a memorandum of agreement with Philippine Agriculture Secretary Arthur C. Yap to promote agricultural trade and investment between the two countries. The objective is to advance agricultural cooperation, productivity and sustainable natural resource management through science and technology collaboration. In addition to the memorandum, USDA will sponsor a trade and investment mission to the Philippines sometime in the fall…

…The Philippines is a key market in Southeast Asia for U.S. agricultural exports, with sales reaching over $950 million in fiscal year 2007, the highest level ever. The United States remains the top food and beverage supplier to the Philippines. At the same time, the United States is the number one market for Filipino agricultural products, with sales for more than $621 million in fiscal year 2007, including coconut oil, tropical fruits and vegetables and sugar.

The Philippines is the first Asian country to approve the planting of a biotechnology food crop—corn—and remains a consistent supporter of rational, science-based regulations in many international bodies. The Philippines remain on schedule to commercialize genetically engineered, insect-resistant eggplant in 2009 and virus-resistant papaya and nutritionally-enhanced rice soon thereafter.

So they committed to maintaining a healthy market for American exports, and putting together a junket for American agriculturists close to the election, and most of all, to pursuing the export and use of genetically-modified corn, eggplants, papaya and then rice. I’m sure the environmentalists will find this agreement something to chew on.

Powered by Gregarious (21)

For your consideration: lessons learned from past food subsidies

06/18/08

Posted under Uncategorized

it may be useful, at this point, to take a look at this report: “14 Food Subsidies in the Philippines: Preliminary Results”, by Marito Garcia. See: ppa88ch14.pdf” t

Powered by Gregarious (21)

Is Mindanao hitting the fan?

06/03/08

Posted under Philippine politics

Yesterday’s headline screamed, Soaring rice prices grip Mindanao folk: Staple sold at P45-P51 per kilo. This is only the latest problem in a cluster of problems that periodically drift into the headlines and then out again.

Blogger Radioactive Adobo recently recounted, and asked:

Last weekend, I was in Robinson’s Supermarket and vowed never to buy veggies there. I mean, seriously - a bunch of local pechay for Php 11? A piece of ampalaya for Php 30? I have always enjoyed going to the market and that’s what I do all the time, except for this particular visit. This morning at the Masinag Wet Market, turned out that a bunch of pechay is Php 10 already (Php 5 only a few months ago). The cheapest rice in my area sells for Php 31 and the most expensive is Php 45 (Jasmine), but in Mindanao where food is known to rot in markets because of overabundance, why did this happen? Something is terribly wrong down South.

If you look at Inquirer.net’s Rice Map, you’ll see why I think that one main problem is no one seems to really have a clue as to what’s going on in Mindanao. And that most significantly, at the forefront of the clueless is our government as a whole and not just the administration.

Just two screencaps to show you what I mean.

Here are rice price data for Iloilo and Kidapawan cities:

iloiloriceprices.jpg

kidapawanriceprices.jpg

Look at all the “N/A” or “not available” fields!

Now you tell me just how anyone, starting with our officials, whether in the bureaucracy of the Departments of Finance, Trade and Industry, or of Agriculture, or the National Economic Development Authority or even the Central Bank, or other agencies such as the National Food Authority, can be expected to come up with a timely appreciation of conditions if their data isn’t even complete?

For some time now, a mystery that’s bugged me is why rice prices are so high in Iloilo (it’s marked on the rice prices map with a red balloon), when Panay’s bulging with rice and as a port city, it should have access to rice from other markets. Add to this mystery the new mystery in Mindanao, which has also had bumper crops and yet now has a sudden increase in rice prices.

Take a look at this article in The Asia Sentinel, Rice Shortage: Crisis or Hype? According to the writer, Jet Damazo-

The leader of the world’s largest rice importer, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, is now being attacked by critics for actions that would otherwise have been praised if the shortage had been real—raising farm gate prices to encourage local farmers to produce more rice, jailing rice hoarders and promoting alternative staples like sweet potatoes to her rice-consuming constituents — saying these led to more hoarding and pushed prices higher. The Philippines, it turns out, has 54 days of rice stocks on hand, nearly double China’s….

So was the rice shortage real or perceived? Adam Barclay, a spokesperson for the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), based in the Philippines, maintains that the real underlying cause of the rice price increase is the long-term imbalance between demand and supply, which has gradually pushed up prices since 2001…

Food security expert Mohiuddin Alamgir, former director for policy and planning at the International Fund for Agricultural Development and currently a consultant with the Asian Development Bank, also agrees that the country’s actions, along with speculative commodities traders and opportunistic rice traders, contributed to the spike in prices.

“There is a structural gap in the country’s supply and demand of rice, which is why the Philippines is now the world’s largest importer of rice. The world knows this and so the country’s actions will always impact the market,” Alamgir explained, adding that the manner in which the government came into the market can be debated, as it may have sent the wrong signal. But, he says, had it not been for Arroyo’s actions, the country would have been in a worse situation, prices today would have been much higher, and lines at the government’s subsidized rice stores would have been longer.

So to give credit where credit it due, the President stopped a bad situation from getting worse -or did she? So what’s going on in Mindanao?

Could it be, that people are hoarding, in expectation of fighting resuming between Muslim rebels and the government? Recall my recent entry here, Some readings on Mindanao. The unraveling of the peace talks has been taking place almost in slow motion. You may also want to revisit an entry I wrote in my own blog in 2007, Thoughts on Mindanao, as well as a more recent column, The quest for an honest broker.

Powered by Gregarious (21)

The clever Filipino

05/19/08

Posted under Media matters

O diba?

DSC00057#2.JPG

Powered by Gregarious (21)

Some readings on Mindanao

05/08/08

Posted under Philippine politics

Yesterday and today’s Inquirer editorials have focused on the possible breakdown of talks between our government and the MILF in Mindanao, and the possibility that Malaysia, a partner in the peace talks, might pull out. My column for today looks at what Malaysia’s interest in the peace process is.

A very interesting explanation of the issues confronting government and MILF negotiators, and which goes a long way in explaining the genesis of the tensions between Muslims and Christians in Mindanao, is a paper that was published on line last year. It’s by Atty. Zainudin S. Malang and is titled, Examining the Nexus Between Philippine Constitutionism and the Mindanao Conflict. If you want a crash course in the issues, this paper’s a good place to start.

When our nation-building resumed in 1935, Muslim leaders were brought into national politics and until the 1950s, seemed fairly succesfully integrated. But in the 1960s, things started breaking down -and at a rapid pace. Malang explains why:

Up until the 1950s, the state had adopted numerous land distribution laws and enforced resettlement policies that dramatically changed the demographics of Mindanao. But by the 1960s, the demographic reengineering program assumed a far more sinister form. Through military support for a para-military movement of settlers known as the Ilagas, land dispossession in Central, Northern, Southern, Eastern, and Western Mindanao was achieved through outright forcible land-grabbing.

It was this land-grabbing that precipitated the formation of the Bangsa Moro Liberation Organization which, together with the original Moro National Liberation Front that spawned the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, launched the modern armed day struggle for re-assertion of Moro identity and right to the homeland

In addition, there are many online resources for those who want to take a deeper look into the issues raised. Political analyst Mon Casiple, in his blog entry, says that tensions have increased because the peace process’ own issues have been joined by tensions over the forthcoming ARMM elections.

Additional background’s provided in a paper, The GRP-MILF Peace Talks: Quo Vadis?, by Rizal Buendia and another paper of his, a comparative study, The Secessionist Movement and the Peace Process in the Philippines and Indonesia: The Case of Mindanao and Aceh, may also interest you. The Asia Foundation blog early this year discussed Critical Challenges in Asia: Violent Conflict and Fragile States (including the Philippines) and also pointed to a book about succesful peace-building efforts in Mindanao: see Conflict in Mindanao.

Powered by Gregarious (21)

Who influences your thinking?

04/28/08

Posted under Uncategorized

Foreign Policy unveils its list of The Top 100 Public Intellectuals (based on certain criteria) and asks readers to vote for their own top 5 (you can also write-in a candidate).

I voted for:

Umberto Eco (I first encountered him when I was 14 and picked up a copy of “The Name of the Rose” that someone left on the bus; another novel of his I enjoyed was “Foucault’s Pendulum” though it’s his essays I enjoy the most, for example his essay on computer operating systems, and his collected works, like “How to Travel with a Salmon: And Other Essays”; but also, “On Ugliness” is a marvelous demonstration on what his profession’s all about).

Anne Applebaum (I’ve read “Gulag: A History” and follow her articles on Slate).

Ian Baruma (I’ve read “The Wages of Guilt: Memories of War in Germany and Japan”, and “Inventing Japan: 1853-1964″, and most recently, “Murder in Amsterdam: The Death of Theo van Gogh and the Limits of Tolerance”)

i view Appleabaum and Baruma as of a piece: their reflections on authoritarian uses of power, are, well, powerful, indeed.

Malcolm Gladwell (who hasn’t read “The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference”? Or at least heard the phrase used ad nauseam?)

Jeffrey Sachs (you know, “The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time”)

You can find their bios here.

Voting closes on May 15!

Powered by Gregarious (21)

Thundering and Shrilling: Or, When Columnists Collide

04/24/08

Posted under Media matters

John Nery and I have a shared, pre-PDI heritage, and that’s having been onetime workers in Today Newspaper. But John was involved in the news-gathering side of it. For my part, I was mentored by Teddyboy Locsin (our Publisher) in opinion writing -in the grand manner of his father, Teodoro M. Locsin who once wrote of himself, “I thundered and shrilled -that is, I wrote editorials.”

And I’m sure you’ve noticed the difference -I tend to be more heated, more willing to pick a fight, on paper than John does, and he tends to be more analytical, more interested in nuance and the facts, less inclined to partisanship.

But you know, at the end of the day every writer will, sooner or later, cross pens with another.

On April 22, John’s column, Armchair radicals, came out (I’m linking to the version of his column on his blog, because it has all the relevant links embedded in it), which was a response to the various criticisms-as-responses to recent suggested guidelines circulated by the Jesuits. John specifically set out to dissect Jesuitic placebo by Filomeno Sta. Ana III and Manuel Buencamino.

A jolly all-in-the-family rumble, I said, all of the writers being Ateneans and reacting to their Jesuit mentors’ political prescription. Nery and Buencamino also happen to be columnists who also happen to be bloggers. The merry mix-up, if you want to see more, is all laid out over at Ateneans Act.

Well, sure enough, a counter-response came out, titled Teachers Pwet. Meanwhile, John started a response in A Dear John letter, but hasn’t gone back to it.

My own views are closer to John’s in theory, perhaps, though emotionally I’m happier with the aggressiveness of Sta. Ana and Buencamino (you don’t have to go further back than two recent columns of mine, The 2010 Movement and Resistance isn’t futile ).

What’s interesting -aside from the arguments themselves, both stylistically and in terms of content- is that they’re taking place in several places: in the newspapers, in message boards, in columns and in blogs. It’s all part of a larger clash of contending views on what should be done (but you can go to my own blog to read more about that). For now, check out these blog entries: If you ran this country… by Jim Paredes (also an Atenean), I am Change, Are You? by Harvey Key (also an Atenean) who’s inviting students and young professionals to the first-ever TEAM RP GENERAL ASSEMBLY: Saturday, 26 April, 1PM (more on this from Chronicles from the Middle of Nowhere).

Now is this all only of interest to Ateneo de Manila alumni? I think not, not being an Atenean myself.

What do you think?

Powered by Gregarious (21)

Test

04/22/08

Posted under test

We’re back! Who’s glad?

Powered by Gregarious (21)

What would YOU do …

12/17/07

Posted under Philippine politics

if you were in their shoes?

Faithful reader Abbygail asks a provocative question:

… if you will be tapped by the govt. to serve in teves’ shoes, what will you do to change the rut we’re in? help the people w/ your ideas. we cannot be blaming each other forever and just sit still. what will you do if given that chance to serve?

I personally do not think that an interactive forum like ours requires its participants to offer specific alternatives (in contrast, for example, to a newspaper editorial). It’s more than enough to express ourselves and discuss issues with others. But I do share Abbygail’s concern about moving forward (note, please, that I did not use that old plea to “move on” — euphemism for forgiving and forgetting).

If we were in a high official’s place, what, specifically, would we do? No need to limit ourselves to Finance Secretary Gary Teves; how about we choose one department (say, DND) or agency (say, Pagcor), and then offer our proposed (specific) solutions?

Should be interesting. But, please, keep it specific. As they say, God (or the devil) is in the details.

Powered by Gregarious (21)
Welcome to
Inquirer Current. A current-events blog by Inquirer columnist Manuel L. Quezon III and Inquirer editor John Nery.
INQUIRER.net VDO

Search

Archives
Categories
Close
E-mail It