My column today, Don’t engage or dignify it , makes reference to these two documents, submitted by Atty. Adel Tamano to the Committee on Justice of the House of Representatives.
The first document is an Addendum/Supplement to the Pulido complaint, in an effort to fortify the case.
The second document is Tamano’s response to Rep. Matias Defensor’s rejecting the Addendum/Supplement:
Both make reference to the original impeachment complaint submitted by Atty. Pulido and endorsed by Rep. Edgar San Luis:
You can judge for yourself the merits (if any) of the Pulido complaint, the arguments of Tamano as to why they could do with some fortifying, and his counter-arguments when Rep. Matias Defensor rejected Tamano’s submissions.
Better for the complaint to be weak and gummy, than to allow it have teeth; the House dentists are against any legal dentures. But then, it may be that the absence of teeth is due to the Supreme Court, as the PCIJ reports here: Impeachment case brought to SC.
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (3)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (6)
- May 2009 (11)
- April 2009 (6)
- March 2009 (5)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (11)
- December 2008 (7)
- November 2008 (14)
- October 2008 (8)
- September 2008 (3)
- August 2008 (10)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (4)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (3)
- December 2007 (5)
- November 2007 (5)
- October 2007 (8)
- September 2007 (13)
- August 2007 (6)
- July 2007 (14)
- June 2007 (5)
- May 2007 (24)
- April 2007 (23)
- March 2007 (18)
- Foreign affairs (17)
- May 2007 elections (36)
- May 2010 elections (5)
- Media matters (22)
- Philippine politics (131)
- Religious issues (13)
- Rule of law (13)
- Terrorism (7)
- test (1)
- Uncategorized (41)
- US relations (16)
6 Feedbacks on "House dentists reject dentures"
Manuel L. Quezon III: The Daily Dose » Blog Archive » Farcical procedures
[…] Hence my column for today, which was Don’t engage or dignify it. You can read the documents I mentioned over at my entry for today in Inquirer Current. […]
Bert
Simple lang ito. Halimbawa ako ay dentist. At halimbawa na ako ay naging dentist dahil sa tulong ng isang mapagkawanggawa. Bigyan natin ng ngalan ang isang masasabing ‘good samaritan’ bilang pagpupugay sa isang marangal at kapuri-puring katangian. At para madaling maintindihan ang usapan. Halimbawa na ang pangalan ng tumulong sa akin para maging isang dentist ay si Ate Golo. Ito ngayon. May isang bungal na mama na lumapit sa akin, at sabi, “Doc, lagyan mo nga ako ng ngipin, kasi galit na galit ako kay Ate Golo. Gusto ko, Doc, matalim na matalim na ngipin ang ilagay mo sa akin dahil kakagatin ko si Ate Golo. Ito ngayon ang tanong ko kay MLQ3 at sa PCIJ. Lalagyan ko ba ng matalim na ngipin (o’ maski mapurol) ang bungal na mama?
INQUIRER.net Blogs » Books, ‘House dentists’ and Baguio boys
[…] L. Quezon III blogs about “House dentists” in […]
MC_90
Bert,
What an analogy….very very very higlyyyy intellectual…..(if you know what i mean)
Bert
I know what you mean, thanks anyway.
abbygail
re adel tamano…someone said on tv that adel’s posturings and constant appearance on tv is a preparation for 2010 senatorial elections…agree 100%.
remember when cayetano and escudero where all over and foisted on us by abs-cbn esp., tried to impeach davide(of all people!) but failed. but look where they are now? senador na! yan ang “intelligent electorate”…popularity and money contest.
that’s why the impeachment complaint of tamano et al is “hilaw”, it is not sincere, it does not speak of real substance but personal interests, and that is 2010 sen. elections. its a numbers game you say, yes, but first the proponents should have a noble purpose. they are just like the sitting adm. politicos…in visayan “amo man gihapon!” tinuod!
Please Leave a Comment!