HISTORY repeats itself like a broken record.
Before, it was conjugal dictatorship and cronies. Then, it was Kamag-anak, Inc.
Now, we call it political dynasty. Really, there's nothing new under the sun.
The Estradas had set a bad precedent when mother and son won simultaneous seats
in the Senate. In the recent election, we saw senatoriables with kin already s
itting in the Senate. That's one the reasons why I did not vote for Alan Cayeta
no, Vic Magsaysay and Koko Pimentel (See my previous blog entry: http://inquirerbloggers.net/eleksyon2007/2007/05
/16/why-i-did-not-vote-for-pichay-cayetano-et-al/).
In our country, we see fathers sitting as mayors with their children sitting as
congressmen. In one city, four brothers ran for mayor, congressmen for both of
its districts, and party-list representative. When the local official finishes
his third term, he makes his wife run for the position. Then we also discover
that some of the nominees of the party-lists are children of congressmen.
Why do we tolerate this? Before the election I went to Bicol. I asked a pedicab
driver why he would vote for Dato Arroyo. He answered, "Siyempre anak siya
ng pangulo. Eh di mas malakas sa taas." (Of course, he is the son of the
president. So he must be well-connected up there.) What if Dato loses this ele
ction? Does that mean the President will neglect that district in Bicol? That i
s why political dynasty is so unfair.
Now, these politicians claim that there's no law against it. Granted, it may no
t be illegal. But it is immoral. Democracy is about equality. Where is equality
in political dynasty? Is there equality when power is concentrated on just a f
ew influential families? I heard Alan Cayetano say that kings pass on power to
their sons. Mr. Cayetano, we are not under a monarchy. Well, at least in a mona
rchy, the king dies first before the prince takes over. Why not wait for your s
ister to step down before you run for senator? How can siblings (or father and
son as in the case of the Pimentels) be a fair representative of the entire cou
ntry? Where's equality in that?
They claim that they are qualified. Fine. "Sila lang ba ang mga anak ng Diy
os?" (Are they the only children of God?) Are they the only ones qualified
? Plus, they are not just banking on their qualifications. They are taking adva
ntage of name recall. That's undue advantage. Did they focus solely on their qu
alifications in their campaign? Really now? Did the voters vote for them solely
because they are qualified?
Senator Aquilino Pimentel Jr. claimed that political dynasty is not prohibited
by the ten commandments. Well, Mr. Senator, it is. God said, "Thou shalt no
t steal." Isn't political dynasty stealing the opportunity to serve from o
thers?
At least, Senator Panfilo Lacson had the moral courage not to allow one of his
sons to run for a local elective position. He told his son not to run while he
is a senator.
It seems to me that it's all about power. I believe they just could not let go
of power, that they just want to perpetuate themselves in power, that they lust
for power so much that they want more of it. That's why any anti-dynasty bill
is doomed to failure even before it is put on paper.
Recently in Alan Peter Cayetano Category
I THINK that since the election is now over save for the counting we can now do
a post-election evaluation. Maybe candidates can learn a thing or two from thi
s.
I did not vote for Pichay because he apparently spent so much for his political
ads. This worried me. Where will he get the money to recoup his "investments"?
Also, there were so many ads that I feel it backfired. I got fed up hearing hi
m promise that he dreams of fulfilling my dreams. But it seems the only way for
him to do that is that I must first fulfill his dream of becoming a senator.
I did not vote for Sonia Roco because of her "para silang autistic" re
mark aired over national TV. That's a very callous statement. She claimed in he
r apology that she was not poking fun at children with special needs. But the f
act that she used the word autistic had hurt me. By the way, autistic is not th
e politically correct term. It's "children with autism." Because we have to see
the child beyond his or her autism.
I did not vote for Alan Peter Cayetano. Every time I hear him, he always attack
s. What will he do in the Senate? Attack some more? He got suspended in the las
t Congress for his false accusations against the First Gentleman. My dear lawma
ker, "tsismis" (or gossip) should have no room in a lawmaker's mind. L
eave that to showbiz gossip writers. You cannot make laws based on "tsismis
." Verify your facts first. Gather evidence before calling for an investig
ation. That way you will save us taxpayers our time and money. Cayetano came ac
ross as a witch hunter, not a fiscalizer that he tried to package himself.
Plus, I cannot stomach his arguments against the political dynasty issue thrown
at him. He claimed that, before he ran, he challenged PGMA that if she will no
t allow her sons to run for Congress, he will also not run as senator. That's b
aloney! If he really thinks that political dynasty is wrong, he should not run.
Period.
This political dynasty issue is also the reason why I did not vote for Koko Pim
entel and Vic Magsaysay. They already have relatives sitting in the Senate. Can
't they wait for their relatives to step down before running for the senate?
I did not vote for Loren Legarda for she came off to me as someone out to be in
power no matter what's the price. Whenever I see her, I see ambition written a
ll over her face. She cried when the envelope was not opened in the Estrada im
peachment trial. But during the campaign, I saw her all smiles while Erap is ra
ising her hand. Where's her convictions? Were they for convenience or expedienc
y?
I did not vote for Antonio Trillanes not only for the Oakwood mutiny but also h
e came across as arrogant. First, he claimed it would be a slap for PGMA if he
wins while campaigning behind bars. But then he applied for bail. It appeared
to me that it was all for media sound bites.
Well, some of these candidates may have won in this election. I just hope my pe
rceptions are wrong. But I think I will not regret dumping them. It's my vote.
It's my choice.
HERE'S behind-the-scenes footage from today's Eleksyon 2007 Podcast recording session.
Senatorial bet Alan Peter Cayetano answered INQUIRER.net reporter Veronica Uy's
question on whether he would seek a review of the Visiting Forces Agreement.
I THOUGHT I'd support Alan Peter Cayetano's senatorial bid. But, after hearing
that he would vote for abolishing the Senate), I'd say the people should not wa
ste their votes on him.
We need an even stronger Senate, and the least we could have are senators who b
elieve in having two houses of Congress. It is bad enough that the House of Rep
resentatives sold us for the price of their pork barrel. Now, the last thing we
need is a Senate with members who do not believe in the importance of its role
in the checks and balances that Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has weakened.
Let's have senators who will serve our people and our Constitution well, not se
nators who see only the political title and power that come with an elected pos
ition.
As Cayetano has shown his real political color, I am hoping that the Genuine Op
position (GO) will drop him from its senatorial slate.
The senatorial race is beyond fighting Arroyo and the First Gentleman, although
that is a collateral benefit and a necessary and almost inevitable result of g
oing for GO.
-- AURORA RIEL, 503 E High Street, Murfreesboro, North Carolina (via e-
mail)
