By Alex Villafania, hackenslash Reporter
INQUIRER.net
IN PART 1, Shrek was funny for his ogre attitude and irreverent sarcasm that merged quite well with Donkey’s fast-talking effervescent jibes. In Part 2, Shrek had to deal with a Spanish-speaking, swashbuckling Puss in Boots but he was still funny. In Part 3, well, Shrek was simply not funny enough to compensate for a sequel that attempted to cash in on the popularity of the fat, green fairy tale monster. Just imagine: kids yanking their parents to the movie house to watch “Shrek 3,” even if the parents wouldn’t expect as much fun watching it.
It should be understood, though, that movies like these are not meant for tired and jaded adults. It’s for kids who marvel at the 3D rendered antics rather than the jokes, which are most often, subtly adult in nature.
OK, so I do sound cynical about “Shrek 3″ but that’s because this new installment in the DreamWorks franchise puts too many characters in the movie. Sure there was a motley crew of fairy tale creatures in the first two movies but at least they remained funny and consistent throughout. In Part 3 the producers had to give some airtime to the three fairytale princesses, namely Sleeping Beauty, Snow White and Rapunzel who acted more prima donna than their antagonists in their respective fairy tales. Plus, these three princesses’ acting was, to say the least, bad. They could win the Razzies for worst supporting virtual actresses if ever there was such an award.
[Read the rest of this entry »]