Quantcast

Two is lucky number for Fantastic Four

06/18/07

Posted under Cool Stuff, Republic of Comics

By Alex Villafania, hackenslash Reporter
INQUIRER.net

THE FIRST “Fantastic Four” film was a good popcorn movie but not as well-made as other Marvel-based movies such as “Spider-Man” and “X-Men,” despite doing well in the tills. But the Fantastic 4 sequel is something of a surprise, particularly the storyline that stuck close to the material, except for a few changes in characterization. Simply put, the second F4 movie is one of the few sequels that have surpassed expectations.

One of the more difficult parts in doing a sequel is merging separate plots into a cohesive storyline and in the case of “Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer,” there was lower expectation about the narrative due to the largely bad reviews from the first film. Fanboys of the comic book did not like the overly simplistic characterization of the heroes and even ordinary moviegoers only saw a regular action flick with the sultry Jessica Alba as the cherry on top. The first F4 flick suffered somewhat a “lechon manok” effect amid Hollywood studios taking Marvel comics licenses to turn them into money-making movies. Not surprisingly, F4 was overshadowed by the successes of the Spider-Man and X-Men movies, as well as minor success of the first Hulk film (with the exception of the badly mangled Punisher film).

In “F4: Rise of the Silver Surfer,” there are two distinct stories, namely the wedding of Reed Richards (Mr. Fantastic) and Susan Storm (Invisible Girl), as well as the appearance of the cosmic being known as the Silver Surfer. The Richards-Storm wedding is notable in the story arc of both the comic book series as well as the movie as it depicts the complexities of settling down amidst a media circus as well as their responsibilities to society.

Meanwhile, Silver Surfer is well chosen to play the part of the mysterious planetary antagonist, his mission initially being obscure to movie viewers until the end.

But it is the Silver Surfer plot thread that is the highlight of the film and all throughout, the Silver Surfer appears to be the villain. Not even the return of the F4’s perennial enemy, Victor Von Doom (from the first film) could undermine the mysterious mission of Silver Surfer. From the time he arrives on the planet, the cosmic being has affected the natural balance of the places that he passes by. He flies faster than Johnny Storm (The Human Torch), can go through solid objects without destroying them, is virtually indestructible against human weapons and can travel from outer space and back to earth with ease. The idea of an ultimate being as embodied by the Silver Surfer is easy enough to understand unlike “regular” super heroes whose powers have to be explained. This makes it easier for the movie writers and producers to chuck in Silver Surfer to save time to explain his origins and focus more on what he really means to do to the planet, which is to serve Galactus as his herald in seeking out planets for the cosmic entity to consume.

The F4 sequel also stuck with some of the original portrayal of the F4 superheroes and the acting has been fine-tuned to prevent the same inane characterization of the cast. Reed Richards (played by Ioan Gruffudd) talks and acts like the comic book character he is portraying, while the Thing/Ben Grimm (Michael Chiklis) and Human Torch (Chris Evans) have become more humorous than they were in the first film with their constant verbal tussles. Jessica Alba’s portrayal of a sensitive but hot-looking Sue Richards is something that fanboys would still have to learn to appreciate.

But the best non-canonical portrayal of a comic book character must be the world devourer Galactus, who is shown only at the last part of the film and is nothing more than a huge but mute dark cloud that can cover five planets.

Again, fanboys will definitely not agree with the directors (and with me) in the portrayal of Galactus who is shown as a huge humanoid in the comic books but there are advantages to using an antagonist without any dialogue or a physical body. That is to allow the enigmatic Silver Surfer to explain himself who Galactus is and to make viewers more curious as to what Galactus would look like. Being a cosmic being, Galactus can take any form he wants — in this case, a huge galactic cloud. Also, Marvel comic book enthusiasts would know that Galactus can never be destroyed (he is, after all, an essential element in the creation of the universe in the Marvel comic book context) but the F4 sequel would have the Silver Surfer using all his cosmic energies to turn Galactus inside out.

Criticism by fanboys aside, “Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer” is a surprise hit that most viewers and marginal comic book fans would appreciate and enjoy due to the superhero theme, the elements of hilarity among the characters, and the visual effects.

Powered by Gregarious (21)

6 Responses to “Two is lucky number for Fantastic Four”

Pages: [2] 1 » Show All

  1. 6
    hackenslash » Is there a Dr. Doom in the house? Says:

    [...] more videos, visit iVDO. And check out Alex Villafania’s review of the “Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer” movie. [...]

  2. 5
    Mike Says:

    I also agreed that it sucked when I saw Galactus as space dust. Where’s the funny hat? Where’s the purple and blue jumpsuit?

    Vit then hit the nail on the head:
    “From what I know, Galactus has a distinguishable form. But he has the choice on how he can show himself. This is debatable but I think the writers chose not to show Galactus in humanoid form to create a sense of great power.

  3. 4
    Icecold09 Says:

    I agree they set us up for a big disappointment in the end. Galactus? A huge pile of debris in space? What a let down

  4. 3
    INQUIRER.net Blogs » Blogging from a hospital and taking a walk Says:

    [...] hackenslash : Two is lucky number for Fantastic Four By Joey Alarilla Feedbacks on this entry via RSS 2.0 Please leave a Comment or discuss via Trackback! Comments Please Leave a Comment! [...]

  5. 2
    Vit Says:

    I’ve seen the 2 movies and I can say that the second one really is much better than the first one.

    Now, I’m not a purist but aside from the bad acting of Jessica Alba and a somewhat weak story line, the movie seemed very entertaining. Somewhat lacking in cool action sequences but still entertaining.

    As for the scene where silver surfer raised invisible woman from the dead. I’ve read somewhere that there is a rumor that since silver surfer has almost limitless powers, there is a possibility that he can resurrect the dead. A possibility. The writers of the second movie took advantage of this. Well…this is Hollywood. Remember Spider-man 1 wherein they showed that Spider-man has a natural ability to spun web from his wrist? This ability was created by Peter Parker when he somehow manipulated his DNA so he can spun web from his wrist. Most people don’t know this. Again, this is Hollywood.

    I was also disappointed when they finally showed Galactus. From what I know, Galactus has a distinguishable form. But he has the choice on how he can show himself. This is debatable but I think the writers chose not to show Galactus in humanoid form to create a sense of great power. This actually, I think, is good for the movie.

    It is rare in Hollywood films to be very loyal comic books’ story, characterization, and origins. I can forgive them. But many, especially the purist, can’t.

Pages: [2] 1 » Show All

Leave a Reply

Welcome to
hackenslash, the gaming site of INQUIRER.net. Manila-based INQUIRER.net is the online home of the Philippine Daily Inquirer group of publications.
INQUIRER.net VDO

hackenslash: the podcast PupuPlayer FREE

Search

Archives
Categories
Close
E-mail It