DO you love science? If so, who instilled a love for science in you?
Which scientist is your hero, who inspired you to learn more about science or even become a scientist yourself.
I didn't become a scientist, but I do have two heroes: Albert Einstein, for his brilliance and compassion for humanity, and Carl Sagan, for sharing his vision for science and making more people aware of its importance.
Who's your hero?
They blinded us with science
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.inquirer.net/cgi/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4380
6 Comments
Leave a comment
Categories
- Agriculture (6)
- Alan Turing (1)
- Alternative Fuels (25)
- Animals (5)
- Astronomy (6)
- Awards (12)
- Biodiversity (9)
- Biology (8)
- Biotechnology (1)
- Black Holes (2)
- Brain Drain (2)
- Breakthroughs (2)
- China
- Climate Change (31)
- Cloning (1)
- Competitions (13)
- Conferences (8)
- DOST (1)
- Dinosaurs (4)
- Education (7)
- Electric Cars (3)
- Energy (1)
- Environment (64)
- Evolution (2)
- Food (1)
- Fossils (3)
- GMO (2)
- Genetics (6)
- Global Warming (15)
- Going Green (2)
- Gravity (1)
- Health (1)
- How-To (1)
- Hybrid Cars (1)
- IRRI (1)
- Ice Age (1)
- Importance of Science (10)
- Innovation (23)
- Inside Science Team (2)
- Inventions (9)
- Math (3)
- Math Olympics (2)
- Medicine (9)
- Minerals (1)
- Museums (1)
- News (38)
- Nuclear Energy (2)
- Paleontology (3)
- Patents (3)
- Philippines (1)
- Policy (5)
- Queena Lee (3)
- Renewable Energy (1)
- Research (31)
- Robotics Olympiad (1)
- Robots (9)
- Scholarships (1)
- Science (general) (82)
- Science Centrum (1)
- Simulation (3)
- Space (24)
- Sports Science (1)
- Stephen Hawking (1)
- Students (13)
- Telehealth (1)
- Tips (1)
- Turing machine (1)
- Uncategorized (19)
- Videos (20)
- WWF (1)
- Weather (2)
- Women (1)
- alternative energy (2)
- clean energy (1)
- disasters (5)
- greenpeace (1)
- modern computer (1)
- science education (1)
- scientists (15)
- tectonic plates (1)
- wind power (1)
Monthly Archives
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (5)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (3)
- June 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (8)
- March 2009 (9)
- February 2009 (9)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (14)
- November 2008 (17)
- October 2008 (15)
- September 2008 (8)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (9)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (3)
- March 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (5)
- December 2007 (2)
- November 2007 (6)
- October 2007 (25)
- September 2007 (22)
- August 2007 (14)
- July 2007 (12)
- June 2007 (15)
- May 2007 (24)
- April 2007 (15)
Pages
OpenID accepted here
Learn more about OpenID
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by published on April 29, 2007 11:16 PM.
DIY robots was the previous entry in this blog.
DOST eyes 1st RP-made electric vehicle is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

i am an engineer trained in scientific research, but i want to ask scientists, who i know are brilliant and inquisitive about man's life and well-being. I want to know what particle constitutes a spirit..just like light which is made up of particles called photons. Is it energy? matter? why do we see ghosts? what are they made of?
First is that true science as opposed to psuedoscience that is an apparent scientific truth with claimed apparent scientific notions is not blinding. True science is a body of systematic study and pursuit of the truth, it is also and should be logical, verifiable, repeatable, universally publishable work ergo it cannot be made to blind nor is blinding. Being engaged in applied physics work myself in the area of experimental optics and physics instrumentation already for almost a decade now my experience shows that every published work in a peer reviewed scientific journal our lab did has always been a combination of sound theory and backed up by hard experimental data and its correlation after many iterations. It is a product of thinking and rethinking of a good research problem and realizing them on a experimental set-up with your collaborators. For Etong here who claimed to have a scientific training it is better for him to go back to his physics textbook and reread the chapter in optics and electromagnetism then if he is able to hurdle them moved on in the area of modern physics ideas the finish with Quantum Mechanics.
to etong:
if you are really "trained in scientific research" you would know that "ghosts" are not recognized as physical entities, and that ghosts are spirits don't exist. you will never find any valid and legitimate scientific journals about ghosts. if you want to learn more about them consult your local "manghuhula", "albularyo", and read more comic books. :-)
Spirit is non-material. You cannot compare it with anything that is within the material world. Thus, it is not made out of anything.
My hero is Abdus Salam of Pakistan. Aside from being coawardee of the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1979 for his work on the electroweak theory, he pursued a lifelong passion for ensuring that scientists in the relatively poorer countries of the South are given opportunities to do fundamental scienctific research at the highest level. In other words for ensuring that no field of scientific research is to be regarded as "pang-mayamang bansa lang". His eforts lead to the creation of institutions such as the International Center for Theoretical Physics and the Third World Academy of Science.
It doesn't really pay to be a scientist here. Pacman or Bata produce more fans to be like them in the future. If only our education system and the government could create a conducive environment for aspiring scientist, then there would be more comments on this section.