Batt out of hell Part 2

07/31/07

Posted under Uncategorized

Forget the laptops, this time it’s the first class action suit against the iPhone battery. It’s also one of the least thought-out, moronic, gramatically faulty legal documents I’ve seen in a long time.

Apple Inc. and AT&T has been charged by some moron gentleman named Trujillo who believes that Apple and AT&T owe iPhone users big-time for selling them a product with a horribly substandard battery that “can only be charged approximately 300 times before it will be in need of replacement, necessitating a new battery annually for owners of the iPhone.”

Aside from being morons gentlemen, Mr. Trujillo and his lawyers are also morons gentlemen who don’t read. Apple clearly states that the iPhone battery “is designed to retain up to 80% of its original capacity after 400 full charge and discharge cycles.” Like most modern batteries.

Our friends at Gizmodo have more details, plus scans of the actual document for your perusal and enjoyment.

Powered by Gregarious (21)

Leave a Reply

Welcome to
Mac-A-Doodle, Hinge Inquirer Publications group editor in chief Adel Gabot's Mac blog for INQUIRER.net. Manila-based INQUIRER.net is the online home of the Philippine Daily Inquirer Group of Publications.
INQUIRER.net VDO

Search

Archives
Categories
Close
E-mail It