Funny how media is these days. We’ve come full circle, and then we’ve gone around again a couple more times in the past few years.

Used to be we just had radio to listen to. Then the movies came. Then TV. Recorded material came and went: wax cylinders, vinyl, cassettes, film, Beta, VHS, Laserdiscs, CDs, VCDs, DVDs, HD-DVDs, Blu-Ray - we could listen to music and watch shows on tape and discs. Cable came and opened up the world to us - we could watch anything and everything, on demand. We can now pause live TV, and record many shows simultaneously, preprogrammed weeks ahead if we couln’t be there to push the buttons.

Then internet mixed it all up together even more: you can watch live streaming TV, download music and movies and enjoy them on players and computers. All permutations existed, and there wasn’t enough hours in the day to listen to and watch everything we wanted.

If you’ve been reading this blog for a while, you’d know I’m a voracious podcast listener. While the name is new, podcasts are just old-fashioned radio shows at heart. Having worked in radio for two decades and doing three-hour talkathons twice a week for years, there’s a special place in my head and heart for the format. It’s nice to sit back and listen to folk talk about things and discuss them. In the course of listening you get to know them and they feel like they’re your friends.

One of my favorite podcasts is Buzz Out Loud, which is a daily (well, Monday to Friday) tech-news-and-views talk show of indeterminate length (usually about 30 minutes) from CNET. It’s over 700 episodes now, which is a considerable run, and I started listening to it in the upper 300s or so. Hosted by Tom Merritt and Molly Wood, with producer Jason Howell piping in now and then, it’s an interesting and fun show for geeks like me who need to get updated and hear different takes on what’s new. (Give it a try, why don’t you? It’s available free from the CNET site and through the iTunes Store. Links at the end of the post.)

BOL and CNET have lately taken to streaming their podcasts live on cam via UStream as they are recorded, which seems to be an increasingly popular trend with previously audio-only podcasts. (Leo Laporte’s TWIT is also doing the live video streaming thing, along with other shows.)

I’ve been watching, and it strikes me as odd to watch people do a radio show on TV - or in this case, live video streaming via the net. Radio is meant to be heard, and the missing dimension of sight is actually a major factor in the makeup of the show. Watching people talk in front of a mike gets seriously boring after a while - I mean, what are you watching for, facial expressions and wild gesticulation? Radio shows are best heard than seen (no offense, Tom and Molly).

In my talk shows in radio back in the day, I’ve had visitors come and sit in on a live show to watch, and they invariably go glassy-eyed after the novelty of being in the radio booth wears out. After a while they just stare at the soundproofing on the wall and listen, they way they’ve been accustomed to at home or in the car. (It’s a phenomenon similar to when I catch myself at a front row seat at a live concert watching the video monitor coverage instead of the stage - but that’s a topic for another post.)

I’ve been watching BOL vidstream live for a few days now, and I’m the same way. After a few minutes I stop watching Tom and Molly and just listen to them talk, staring absently out into space the way I normally do when I’m plugged in and listening on my morning commute to work everyday on my iPhone. The vidstream is in that odd limbo between TV and radio that sometimes exists when new technologies get mashed up, and it can’t seem to yet find its level and place in the world. Those visually-oriented will sit and watch, and those audally-inclined will just listen. (Said another way, the young ‘uns will watch, and the old farts will listen. I’m an old fart.)

Also, watching them takes out a bit of the mystery of the show. Through my months of listening I’ve created my own CNET studio in my head, and have invented places where Tom and Molly and Jason would sit while they talk, how they would act, how they were dressed - and watching the reality somehow takes the magic out of it. And lately, I find no joy in listening to the audio version of the episode I’ve already watched, and I miss my BOL in the morning.

It may work for some people, but I guess not for me. I’d rather listen to them on my iPhone on the road than watch them on my Mac at 1AM - which is the ungodly hour  they come on in my country. (I had to sneak in the Mac reference, lest some readers berate me again for posting something not Mac-related; this is after all a Mac blog.)

But it’ll find its level eventually, I’m sure. Until then I’ll just listen. After all, Buzz Out Loud is still an audio podcast, and not a TV show; the live video stream is just a bonus for hardcore fans, so I don’t really have any right to complain.

Only BOL completists and obsessives will watch it, I figure; most folk, like me, will stick to the old audio version on their iPods. So why does BOL do it? I guess because, like that adage about why dogs do what they do when they have nothing better to do, they can.

Catch Buzz Out Loud here, and the video stream here (which starts at 5PM GMT) or here, or subscribe to the podcast via iTunes here.

There is this great app called PocketTouch 1.2, made by Dr. S.E. Cantu, DFA, for the iPod Touch and the iPhone, which turns the whole device as a simple audio controller for iPod functions while in your pocket. Great when you’re otherwise occupied and don’t have time to take out the thing and look at it.

All you need to do to play/pause to tap the screen, forward and reverse tracks by swiping left or right, and change volume by swiping up and down. You can even get it to randomly pick a song by shaking the device.

Cool concept and I love it - although the instructions could use a bit of improvement.

On the Settings help page of the app (which is actually thorough), the Depth portion says:

DEPTH: Controls the amount of movement that must be registered before the device realizes it has been shooken. The higher the number, the more the device must be moved.

Hee hee.

Find out more about PocketTouch at www.touchrepo.com, or just run Installer on your device.

I love Product(RED) items. Particularly the ones from Apple - the red iPod nano has always been something I’ve wanted. I even got the matching V-Moda Vibe earphones ready and waiting. As Wayne Campbell said, she will be mine. Oh yes, she will be mine.

The specially-made items are, if you don’t know, editions meant to generate charity funds to fight AIDS and HIV in Rwanda. A portion of the sales from the (RED) items like watches, cellphones, laptops, t-shirts, colognes, credit cards - and iPods - go to this fund. For example, Motorola contributes US$8.50 for each sale of the (RED) Razr, Gap gives 50% of their net profit from (RED) clothing items, and Amex gives 1% of all transactions from their (RED) card. A couple editions of the iPod nano have been made for this campaign, started a year ago by Bono.

After the first year, consumers have generated US$22M for Rwanda, but controversy is heating about the figures, which detractors claim is grossly misrepresented.

Advertising Age magazine reports that the entire campaign has raised only US$18M, but has spent US$100M in advertising collectively. People organizing the campaign claim that they’ve raised US$22M, and have only spent US$50M in advertising. Huh? Ex-squeeze me? Baking powder?

Whatever the case, it’s apparent that they spent more than they raised - and people say that the cause would have been better served if the money spent advertising was given straight to the cause in the first place. Of course, no one really knew this coming in a year ago, but maybe a bit of research and planning might have made the project a bit more worthwhile.

At least they made nice iPods, huh?

More on the issue from The New York Times.

In a no-brainer upgrade, Apple has just (belatedly) upped the iPhone’s storage capacity to 16gb, and the iPod Touch to 32gb.

At first, I got giddy with excitement, as a fanboy is wont to do with something new from Apple. But almost immediately that euphoria deflated as I realized how ho-hum the upgrade is. We’ve been waiting for this for at least six months now. No new and impressive features. No 3G, no better battery, no Air-type slimdown. Outside of the 1.1.3 Firmware, it’s exactly the same banana as the current models, only with more space. And they both cost US$499.

I’m stumped why they don’t go whole hog on the phone and bump it all the way up to 32gb. There’s no reason other than they don’t want to kill the iPod Touch, but I think a high-capacity iPhone without the phone will always have a market. I’d buy a 32gb iPhone if they had one.

I’ve learned to live with 8gb on an iPhone. I’ve been idly ruing my decision to move up (down?) from a 16gb iPod Touch to an iPhone with half the storage; as a phone, the iPhone is actually mediocre and subpar in some areas (like I’ve said in a recent podcast I recorded; you won’t believe the ribbing I got). Now that they’ve doubled capacities, I’m just …underwhelmed. I’d rather get the 32gb iPod Touch than a 16gb iPhone, to be honest about it.

I’m sure fanboys who’ve got not much to live for after realizing the new ultrathin Mac is a lot of hot Air for the most part, will fixate on upgrading their phones to the double-capacity ones. Have fun, guys. I think I’ll wait for something a bit more substantial.

I got a new pair of earphones for the iPhone the other day: The V-Moda Vibe Duo Nero. Lots of contenders to the throne of the white buds, but all things being equal this is the only one worth getting.

iPhone buds are  the Holy Grail of accessories – while the white ones suffice, unfortunately they’re neither here nor there. To be fair they sound ok, but people keep them around because they have the mic and button on the cord. Those inclined to trade them right off for better ones tend to hang on for the functionality. Honestly, there aren’t any real compromise-free options available.

V-Moda previously released the Vibe Duo model which had the phone mic incorporated into it, but it didn’t have the all-important button that answered calls and stopped, started and forwarded tracks – just like the regular buds. The new models, which come in chrome, red and black, have this button, which is a trifle smaller than is convenient.

But the Vibe Duo is the only one that approximates the original buds in configuration and use without taking anything from the mix. The existing alternatives either have too many cords or have little growths and appendages that carry the mic or the button or both.

At US$99 the pair is the best option so far in terms of function and value. With some extras. Of course the plug fits, and the jack seems sturdily made with a knurled grip, as there are on the left and right buds themselves. The sleek chrome of the buds and jacks are well made, but the big surprise is the cords themselves. They are light, soft and pliable, and cloth-covered! The feel like well-made, durable string, and not prone to tangling or retaining odd shapes when they get wrapped around things. A self-sealing leather carry pouch comes in the box, which is a pretty classy bonus.

The buds are in-ears, which are acquired tastes. Some like it, some don’t. I belong to the former, having used many like them in the past. They come with six pairs of replaceable silicone fittings, in three sizes: S, M and L, and in clear or black. I’m most comfortable with the mediums. The in-ears seal out extraneous noise and amplify the sound; I’m glad I don’t have to dial up the volume to full all the time now. Two-thirds is plenty.

One of the comments is that the Bliss silicone fittings have a tendency to fall off their posts, and you find you lose one or the other in common use, forcing you to use the other color, or the other sizes. I own a pair of red V-Moda Vibes, and I was down to just four mismatched pairs until I figured a tiny droplet of glue on the rims when you pop the fittings on usually does the trick. You just have to settle on the size and color and stick with your choice.

Another usual comment is that V-Modas have tradionally been bassy buds; true, but not excessively so. Mids and highs don’t get buried, and the reproduced tones shine through the low lows. I’m prefer flat settings myself, but I can live with the V-Modas.

One of my friends who owns a pair already complains that it’s odd to use the V-Moda Vibe Duos as a handsfree headset, and having taken calls on it, I know what he means. The lack of the ambient noise is a bit disconcerting, since the in-ears shut everything out. But it isn’t a biggie; it’s just a matter of getting used to it,

I’m glad I got these, and can now set the white buds aside as reserves. Two Mac-A-Doodle thumbs up.