Now it’s no longer just a rumor. The US Fed is bailing out American International Group with an $85-billion package (you read that right). Apparently, AIG is indeed too big to fail.
I tried to camp out of Philamlife chief Joey L. Cuisia’s office this morning (well, I really meant sit really demurely in the lobby) just in case he has time to talk to a lowly journalist. Understandably, however, he was up to his ears with teleconferences and board meetings with this new development, but I’m on call the whole day.
Some thoughts that come to mind: Wall Street’s latest convulsions show there might be more casualties out there and all that’s part of the restructuring happening in financial markets. I’ve heard the phrase “the market corrects itself” too many times that it hardly means anything anymore. Now, I think the great white economists might not be speaking in tongues, after all.
Second, does AIG’s case reinforce the principle to “go big” when you’re choosing financial products to buy? Certainly, in this case its size saved it, but I’m not yet sure what that means on the regulatory side. The debate is heating up in Wall Street on whether this is the dumbest or the smartest move made by the Fed.
What do you think?
Fed rescues AIG
1 TrackBack
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.inquirer.net/cgi/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1425
test... 3RnX7t2 | test ...----- -------- Read More
10 Comments
Leave a comment
Categories
- Educational plan (1)
- Financial Planning (84)
- Frugality Week (23)
- Gifts (3)
- Government (1)
- Guest Posts (3)
- Holidays (12)
- Investing (143)
- Lifestyle (5)
- Marriage (3)
- Millionaires (75)
- Money Makeover (15)
- Money Myth Busters (23)
- MoneySense (1)
- Mutual Funds (8)
- OFW (34)
- Plain Vanilla/CFA (6)
- Pre-Need (12)
- Pre-need industry (4)
- Quiz (1)
- Quotes (1)
- SSS/GSIS (1)
- Saving money (67)
- Smart Habits (2)
- So What Chocnut? (67)
- Uncategorized (4)
- Word of the Week (1)
- Workplace (3)
- alternative investments (2)
- banking (36)
- blog manners (3)
- blogging (3)
- bonds (10)
- books (2)
- budgeting (45)
- buying tips (23)
- career (12)
- charity (4)
- consumer issues (1)
- corporate governance (2)
- credit cards (32)
- customer service (1)
- debt (16)
- economy (38)
- education (3)
- emergency planning (3)
- entrepreneurship (8)
- estate planning (4)
- family finance (99)
- food (4)
- forex (15)
- insurance (22)
- kids and money (20)
- memorial plans (1)
- men and finance (1)
- network marketing (1)
- poverty (6)
- real estate (5)
- remittance (1)
- retirement (19)
- scams (20)
- shopping (24)
- spending habits (57)
- stock market (25)
- subprime (2)
- taxes (5)
- uitfs (1)
- vacations (5)
- wala lang (6)
- weddings (1)
- weekly roundup (1)
- who's who in personal finance (1)
- women and finance (11)
Monthly Archives
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (5)
- July 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (4)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (5)
- March 2009 (15)
- February 2009 (19)
- January 2009 (19)
- December 2008 (23)
- November 2008 (19)
- October 2008 (24)
- September 2008 (23)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (21)
- June 2008 (16)
- May 2008 (15)
- April 2008 (23)
- March 2008 (16)
- February 2008 (26)
- January 2008 (15)
- December 2007 (12)
- November 2007 (20)
- October 2007 (23)
- September 2007 (20)
- August 2007 (27)
- July 2007 (28)
- June 2007 (15)
- May 2007 (22)
- April 2007 (21)
- March 2007 (15)
- February 2007 (1)
Pages
OpenID accepted here
Learn more about OpenID
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by published on September 17, 2008 10:00 AM.
WRAP-UP: Economy braces for whiplash from AIG troubles was the previous entry in this blog.
Lehman chips are falling is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

it's more of a takeover than a rescue as the U.S. government will effectively get a 79.9% equity stake in the form of warrants called equity participation notes.
As the Wall Street Journal reports, "It puts the government in control of a private insurer -- a historic development, particularly considering that AIG isn't directly regulated by the federal government."
but i believe it's a good thing, at least for now, since it stabilizes the situation a bit. the alternative, which is bankruptcy (at it really was imminent less than 24 hours ago) would have had significant impact on global financial markets. quite a few people call such a scenario "catastrophic", had it happened. i also think the Fed's move is the better of two choices -- the other one being to cut the Fed rate and just leave AIG on the mercy of market forces.
I believed it is a smart move by federal goverment. US financial market is in a very delicate position. Disorderly failure of AIG would definitely hurt US economy and it will affect us too since there are some components of US economy that we depend on, like export. Slowdown on US consumer spending will hurt exporting countries like Philippines.
so whats next? all companies in S&P 500 will be under fed? how long will 85 BIllion last? there are so many bad assets in AIG's books.....
too BIG too fail is BS.....
"Going Big" so your ass will be saved when your about to collapse may be taken positively by the employees and those that will benefit directly from it but really a company should be more socially responsible. What happens if no one will be there save your ass? The ramifications to the economy are devastating.
hi salve can you enlighten us more on what causes these "wall street convulsions"?
one of the nice moves by the feds so far...... it averted a global meltdown of economy..... really, a lost of confidence that will cause the run
Pepe,
Here's my shot at your question:
Stock trading for the most part is really all about speculations. Every actors and participants in this grand exercise are watchful about the company’s financials - quarterly and YE release, forecast, budgets, news if any of any SEC or FBI probes or investigations and more importantly ratings - to be exact, if there is any ratings downgrade. Whenever there is a ratings downgrade, expect Wall Street to have some mild to wild sell-off for the simple reason that you don't want to hold on to these investments that are worthless and will be worthless so that you could preempt your losses.
I wrote an easy to understand Subprime101 and how the US housing market works to better understand what happened at Wall Street the other day. I hope this helps. Here's the link:
http://reynaelena.com/2008/09/17/understanding-subprime-and-the-us-housing-market/
thanks reyna elena for the info.
hope that b doesnt bring back card check, that would be a soft tyranny
reports report rise non reduction