<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Money Smarts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Lunch with Buffett for $2.1M? The two sides of generosity by Ghia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/2008/07/03/personal-finance-philippines-lunch-with-buffett-for-21m-the-two-sides-of-generosity/#comment-84506</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/?p=635#comment-84506</guid>
		<description>What is charity then?   

For me charity is helping someone by empowering them.    there are many ways to this:   1)   you can help a house helper who has stopped schooling due to financial problems by sending them to night school or vocational school.   2)  by contributing P450 a month, you can send a less fortunate child to school thru World Vision.  3) or sometimes helping doesn't involve money at all.   I met a Filipino pastor when I used to work in Singapore who runs his own computer shop there.   He conducts free computer classes to Pinay DH in SG on Sundays in his shop (so instead of engaging in "chismisan" during their day off with their fellow DH, they empower themselves by attending these classes).

So, you see, charity doesn't have to mean giving until it hurts.   And oh, it doesn't have to involve many people.   You cannot change the world overnight.   But you can change the world by helping one person at a time....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is charity then?   </p>
<p>For me charity is helping someone by empowering them.    there are many ways to this:   1)   you can help a house helper who has stopped schooling due to financial problems by sending them to night school or vocational school.   2)  by contributing P450 a month, you can send a less fortunate child to school thru World Vision.  3) or sometimes helping doesn&#8217;t involve money at all.   I met a Filipino pastor when I used to work in Singapore who runs his own computer shop there.   He conducts free computer classes to Pinay DH in SG on Sundays in his shop (so instead of engaging in &#8220;chismisan&#8221; during their day off with their fellow DH, they empower themselves by attending these classes).</p>
<p>So, you see, charity doesn&#8217;t have to mean giving until it hurts.   And oh, it doesn&#8217;t have to involve many people.   You cannot change the world overnight.   But you can change the world by helping one person at a time&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The truth behind network marketing by Alex</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/2008/03/31/the-truth-behind-network-marketing/#comment-84500</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/2008/03/31/the-truth-behind-network-marketing/#comment-84500</guid>
		<description>I agree with the four points this article makes, except for the fact that focusing on recruiting is a bad thing. While it's true that there needs to be a product or multiple products involved and sales should be happening, there are many successful, legal mlm companies whose compensation plans reward you very well for sponsoring other distributors more than they do for the sale of products to outside customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the four points this article makes, except for the fact that focusing on recruiting is a bad thing. While it&#8217;s true that there needs to be a product or multiple products involved and sales should be happening, there are many successful, legal mlm companies whose compensation plans reward you very well for sponsoring other distributors more than they do for the sale of products to outside customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on (UPDATED) What to do in a falling market by don2x</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/2008/06/30/personal-finance-philippines-falling-market/#comment-84469</link>
		<dc:creator>don2x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/?p=631#comment-84469</guid>
		<description>i don't know how the short selling is being implemented at pse but it may be worth the risk if the market continues to fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know how the short selling is being implemented at pse but it may be worth the risk if the market continues to fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on (UPDATED) What to do in a falling market by ACN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/2008/06/30/personal-finance-philippines-falling-market/#comment-84460</link>
		<dc:creator>ACN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/?p=631#comment-84460</guid>
		<description>@ salve.. any stock whose price will not exceed 999 petot... eg chib, smic, smph, edc, ac, acpr, fphp, rcb.. atbp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ salve.. any stock whose price will not exceed 999 petot&#8230; eg chib, smic, smph, edc, ac, acpr, fphp, rcb.. atbp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on (UPDATED) What to do in a falling market by alijeffty gonzales</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/2008/06/30/personal-finance-philippines-falling-market/#comment-84397</link>
		<dc:creator>alijeffty gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/?p=631#comment-84397</guid>
		<description>Hi Salve,

When we invests in the stock market whether by making a single investment or by a programmed approach like cost averaging, we faced two inherent risk, systematic risk (overall market risk like inflation, GDP, political developments  etc) and unsystematic risk (company specific risk like MEG , BW or perhaps even ENRON etc..) , based on portfolio management theories, we can minimize the volatility brought about by systematic risk by diversification (not putting everything in one basket), the ideal number of stocks in a stock portfolio varies from 18 to as much as 100 (depending on market depth/breath), we can obviously not be able to diversify a “single” stock and thus seems like “betting” the outcome of our financial goals on the prospect of a single company.

It is sad to note that in the previous years prior to this bear market we are now experiencing, investors seems easy to persuade to ignore these fundamental risks in the prospect of a better return relative to the low interest rate environment. 

For ordinary investors (not trained in the intricate art of stock picking) like you and me, i think it would be more prudent and that we would have a more predictable future outcome if we do cost averaging by investing in a diversified portfolio such as a mutual fund.

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Salve,</p>
<p>When we invests in the stock market whether by making a single investment or by a programmed approach like cost averaging, we faced two inherent risk, systematic risk (overall market risk like inflation, GDP, political developments  etc) and unsystematic risk (company specific risk like MEG , BW or perhaps even ENRON etc..) , based on portfolio management theories, we can minimize the volatility brought about by systematic risk by diversification (not putting everything in one basket), the ideal number of stocks in a stock portfolio varies from 18 to as much as 100 (depending on market depth/breath), we can obviously not be able to diversify a “single” stock and thus seems like “betting” the outcome of our financial goals on the prospect of a single company.</p>
<p>It is sad to note that in the previous years prior to this bear market we are now experiencing, investors seems easy to persuade to ignore these fundamental risks in the prospect of a better return relative to the low interest rate environment. </p>
<p>For ordinary investors (not trained in the intricate art of stock picking) like you and me, i think it would be more prudent and that we would have a more predictable future outcome if we do cost averaging by investing in a diversified portfolio such as a mutual fund.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on (UPDATED) What to do in a falling market by levity</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/2008/06/30/personal-finance-philippines-falling-market/#comment-84349</link>
		<dc:creator>levity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/?p=631#comment-84349</guid>
		<description>1] i'd rather stay on the sidelines in a falling market 
2] i will not add to any shares i still hold onto, at least not yet...
3] i will buy additional shares when the whole rumble is over, and global stocks are starting to recover</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1] i&#8217;d rather stay on the sidelines in a falling market<br />
2] i will not add to any shares i still hold onto, at least not yet&#8230;<br />
3] i will buy additional shares when the whole rumble is over, and global stocks are starting to recover</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ROUNDUP: Inflation is everybody’s problem by levity</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/2008/07/04/personal-finance-roundup-inflation-is-everybody%e2%80%99s-problem/#comment-84348</link>
		<dc:creator>levity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/?p=637#comment-84348</guid>
		<description>there's a rainbow after the rain.

for now, find peace in the middle of the storm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s a rainbow after the rain.</p>
<p>for now, find peace in the middle of the storm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ROUNDUP: Inflation is everybody’s problem by ACN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/2008/07/04/personal-finance-roundup-inflation-is-everybody%e2%80%99s-problem/#comment-84347</link>
		<dc:creator>ACN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/?p=637#comment-84347</guid>
		<description>do you think our situation now is worse than the martial law era? 

If not, smile and say thanks to our Lord.. we survived that era of rampant inflation, civil disorder, and clipped liberty/freedom.

Today's crisis is child's play compared to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you think our situation now is worse than the martial law era? </p>
<p>If not, smile and say thanks to our Lord.. we survived that era of rampant inflation, civil disorder, and clipped liberty/freedom.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s crisis is child&#8217;s play compared to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lunch with Buffett for $2.1M? The two sides of generosity by nina</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/2008/07/03/personal-finance-philippines-lunch-with-buffett-for-21m-the-two-sides-of-generosity/#comment-84311</link>
		<dc:creator>nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/?p=635#comment-84311</guid>
		<description>@mzkukuro,
yes, my friends won't allow me to pay :) Ako naman nakikipag unahan kasi minsan-minsan ko lang sila makita.

@Salve,
Minsa pag may kakuwentuhan akong ibang OFW, ayaw ng magpakita sa mga barkada nila pag umuuwi kasi magastos daw :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mzkukuro,<br />
yes, my friends won&#8217;t allow me to pay <img src='http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Ako naman nakikipag unahan kasi minsan-minsan ko lang sila makita.</p>
<p>@Salve,<br />
Minsa pag may kakuwentuhan akong ibang OFW, ayaw ng magpakita sa mga barkada nila pag umuuwi kasi magastos daw <img src='http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Money mood swings by nina</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/2008/07/02/personal-finance-frugality-tips-money-mood-swings/#comment-84302</link>
		<dc:creator>nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inquirer.net/moneysmarts/?p=634#comment-84302</guid>
		<description>Salve, I think M&#38;S refunds their customer for returned items.  Most stores only allows exchange or they give you credit notes if you paid by credit card.

Minsan kasi nahihiya yong mga customers na magreturn or exchange.  Kahit ako nga dati sa US, mali yong punch.  Yoko na mag-complian kasi nahihiya ako.  Pero sabi ng friend ko sayang daw kaya siya ang nagreklamo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salve, I think M&amp;S refunds their customer for returned items.  Most stores only allows exchange or they give you credit notes if you paid by credit card.</p>
<p>Minsan kasi nahihiya yong mga customers na magreturn or exchange.  Kahit ako nga dati sa US, mali yong punch.  Yoko na mag-complian kasi nahihiya ako.  Pero sabi ng friend ko sayang daw kaya siya ang nagreklamo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
