WHEN we say “masa vote” we are looking at the marginalized in our society, most of whom are citizens who do not legitimately rent or own their abode. Looking deeper into this vote brings to question its credibility. More than the mistake in identifying with silver-screen personalities, these voters are used by the politicians who go around with rhetoric and promises during elections. They are merely used by the politicians, hence the administrative tolerance for squatting. This is why the politicians love the squatters. They love them way too much to the point of even promising land ownership if elected into office.
This electoral symbiotic set-up is the reason for the deeper socio-economic and environmental problems that stem from squatting — unseen to the naked eye and accepted by many as merely a problem that exists.
Just imagine if the squatters will be of no value to the local city mayors. The first order of the day will be beautification. The politicians will justify getting rid of the shanties to make their city a more organized, cleaner place where delivery of goods and services will then be viable. Rightful landowners will be able to boost the economy in real estate or commercial business opportunities. The threat of health and fire outbreaks will be reduced. The policemen will have less crime to deal with. Public schools will not be overcrowded. Most importantly, elections, without the foolishly lured votes, will be able to propel our country forward.
[Read the rest of this entry »]
