by Karla Angelica Pastores
Contributor
We live in a world of options. From the absurd to the monumental, we are constantly faced with a medley of choices. The truth is, we chose this world that we live in ourselves. As individuals, our choices influence and at the same time affect our collective decisions, which in turn build our society. Consumer choices affect what goes on sale. What goes on sale influences what we decide to put in our cart.
For many of us, this buffet of choices is something to rejoice about. We are not limited to only one option; rather, we are free to express our interests and desires through the choices we make. Whether as consumers or voters, we love to have alternatives that would make our lives just a little bit different, and just a little bit better.
Unfortunately, though, alternatives seem to be a missing ingredient in our role as voters. Democracy has given us the power—nay, the responsibility—to choose the one who will serve the Philippines as its leaders. Yet it appears as if this particular role has given us few, if not nothing, options as to who is truly capable of running the country.
One does not need to look far to realize that in this country, we tend to put the blame on every person but ourselves. The economy is in shambles; it’s the government’s fault. The government is ineffective; blame it on the people seated there. The authorities are incapable of performing well, because millions of people did not vote wisely or did not vote at all.
Not surprisingly, many Filipinos, especially the youth, become disenfranchised. If all we have to choose from are the same so-called “leaders†over and over again, the people get discouraged from voting. No one wants to be part of the problem of electing poor-performing officials, but no one also contributes to finding the solution.
The duty of every Filipino citizen to elect a leader does not come only after every three years, just as the duty of every elected public official to serve the people does not come only every election season. There’s a reason why we call those people “public servants.†They’re not at the top of the food chain. The people elected them to that position, the people’s taxes pay for their salaries, and they work for the people, to meet the people’s needs. Now tell me who the boss is here.
The people, as the public servants’ “boss,” have the task of ensuring that the candidates for the next elections are fit and capable of tackling this immense job of holding public office. He will, after all, have at least thousands of bosses. Why then should we leave the decision of whom to place into the political arena solely in the hands of those we chose to serve us? Filipinos should make it their duty to encourage good people to try their hand at servant leadership. Who knows, maybe your neighbor has the makings of being the next President of the Philippines; only no one has told him what a good leader he is.
Encouraging potential government officials does not have to be the gargantuan task of an all-out campaign or a huge rally. A simple “You’re doing a good job!†to a student, a little praise for the team leader in front of colleagues, an extra assignment the team captain can successfully undertake. Good people are not rare. It is precisely because they are good that they don’t flaunt their many achievements and talents for the public to admire them. They do their job well not to gain other people’s approval, but because it is what is right. These are the people who should lead us, the people we should look out for, the people who can. These are the ones whom we should be reading about and getting to know.
Just as we go out of our way to get the best bargain, we should also take that extra step to look for the best servant leaders. Our chances of having good people in public office go up when there are good people in the ballots. When it comes to politics, being choosy is not a bad thing at all.
Kai Pastores, 21, is the program officer for IamChange2010, a joint project of the Ateneo de Manila School of Government and Team RP. It aims to get the young Filipinos to register and vote in the coming 2010 Presidential elections and educate them on various political issues. For inquiries, you may contact Kai at +63 2 4265657.

6 Feedbacks on "Being Choosy"
paul
Why not invite Senate President Manuel Villar and Senator Richard Gordon to debate issues on leadership and governance?
This is the only way to see who measures up for the job of President in 2010.
We’ve heard of Villar throwing tons of money into all sorts of political gimmicks, but what does he really have to offer in terms of leadership and changing the country?
Dick Gordon, the under rated performer, has leadership and experience. If we’re looking for the next President, we should look no further than Gordon.
suzette dioniso
Very well said. You have a meandering way of writing. Keep it up.
geli
Before this article, i was dead serious that i won’t vote on 2010, but now, I’ve realized that i still have that duty to my country. I just hope that this campaign will really be known to all because this is something that the youth must be aware of.
Eterio Herrera
The wise decision of Choosing a good leader derives from what these leader can do in solving the no one problem in the philippines which is Poverty, President Erap use this advantage but failed to deliver for he himself is saddled with too many wives and one of the Reason of Why the late Cardinal Sin condemn him, but this was the past and there are present leaders who are really not oblige to someone or to the corrupt political trapo party, so in a sense this Black and White movement belongs to a political party that its sole intention is to select an Honest and transparent leader with no Hello Garci and Playing golf anomalies and can be selected to the group of Governor Panlilio who is a leader and a servant of God that can deliver the moral relativism attitude towards a leader whose intension is to serve the pilipino people. amen
Gloria Kawatan
paul Says:
July 15th, 2008 at 5:01 pm
Why not invite Senate President Manuel Villar and Senator Richard Gordon to debate issues on leadership and governance?
This is the only way to see who measures up for the job of President in 2010.
We’ve heard of Villar throwing tons of money into all sorts of political gimmicks, but what does he really have to offer in terms of leadership and changing the country?
Dick Gordon, the under rated performer, has leadership and experience. If we’re looking for the next President, we should look no further than Gordon.
………………………………
Nothing good well happen to the debate just look what happen to Gloria Arroyo, She talk good promise the filipino people the moon and star. Where is the Philippines today under her stolen administration. In the middle of pacific ocean. Under her bogus regime there is more and more filipino people are starving but she have the nerve to keep bragging her rosy economy. Her so call rosy economy nothing but PAD just like she PAD her votes to ensure her winning. She’s nothing but the biggest liar and a thief.
Atenista
Ms. Pastores,
Beyond writing, are there concrete plans for Team RP?
It seems that you guys are falling into the trap that Harvey Keh did. You may just end up talking to the same people, people who already are convinced that changes must happen in 2010.
Go to a broader spectrum. Do not be limited by Harvey Keh’s pseudo-nationalism.
Go Team RP!
Please Leave a Comment!