By Boogie Boydon
Editor’s note: This article was originally written for Ang Bagong Pinoy by the author. He has given us permission to re-publish it in this blog.
A sense of despair is in our midst. A growing feeling of helplessness and hopelessness pervades our day-to-day lives with more and more Filipinos quietly and patiently simply waiting for an opportunity to bolt from what they perceive as a God-forsaken nation on the brink of collapse. The inability to muster enough numbers to mount another People Power is taken by some as a sign of growing apathy within our ranks. Some people say that the apathy is actually a reflection of heightened mistrust and lack of confidence in our institutions of justice, law-enforcement and governance.
In 1987, American essayist James Fallows wrote that we have a “damaged culture” and went on to say that “because of (this) fragmentation, this lack of useful nationalism, people treat each other worse in the Philippines than in any other Asian country I have seen …” People bristled at his seemingly callous conclusions then but now that we seem to be facing a blank wall in trying to explain why and how this “damaged culture” came about, we find that our history of successive colonization that gave us a frail and confused consciousness to begin with, coupled with the decades of psychological cues we have imbued along the way to what we are now, are worthy of a second look.
I belong to a generation who grew up thinking that our problems will be solved by a masked and flying crusader, a “Darna” within our midst who can solve all our problems without us lifting a finger to do it ourselves. And so we vote to office our varied brands of “heroes” and place our full hope in them, only to be frustrated when they do not live up to our image of a “Lastikman” or a “Captain Barbell.” We do not realize that the solution to our problems could have been within our grasp to start with if only we took it upon ourselves to participate fully in the task of solving them.
Or perhaps we thought that we can be our own “Darna” and imagined a supernatural intervention amidst an apparition of a quick fix. We waited patiently for that elusive one-time meteorite stone that will give us the super powers we long for. We relished the hope given to us by the promise that with the flick of a finger, the lighting of a candle will transform our “Cofradian” blackness into a ravishing “Tisay,” or the wearing of a magic “kamison” will transform our ugly-duckling stature to a beauty and elegance fit for royalty. Thus the lure of the sweepstake, the jueteng and a parade of game shows that promise instant millions that would give us a rags-to-riches experience have time and again proven to be irresistible. Of course nowadays the candle of Cofradia may very well have been replaced by the modern-day Glutathione but that is beside the point.
So we tenaciously hang on and with unwavering resilience are able to withstand the seeming hopelessness and helplessness of our daily grind. At the back of our minds is the hope that we will one day be rewarded with an amulet from the sky that will endow us with extraordinary capabilities that will magically eradicate all our miseries.
The likes of “Da King” FPJ and other screen heroes of the same genre showed us that we can withstand all ridicule, sufferings and pain because in the end we will have the final say and our tormentors will have the comeuppance they so much deserve. “May araw ka din” is what we silently mumble to ourselves in reference to all the Paquito and Romy Diazes and Max Alvarados in our lives.
We have generations of Filipinos who grew up exposed to the antics of the likes of Mang Nano played by actor-comedian Pugo in “Tang-ta-rang-tang” and “Si Tatang Kasi” who flaunt their capability to put one over their neighbor as simply being “ma-abilidad” or “wais.” And it’s not just Mang Nano to whom we owe it to. Decades of comedians after him have practically spun their antics around the same theme: It is not wrong to do something bad, as long as you can get away with it. We have glamorized this part of their comical repertoire to the point that we have begun thinking the same way ourselves. When we encounter a long queue that would definitely inconvenience us, we easily succumb to the temptation of having a friend or even a “fixer” facilitate things for us so that we will not have to go through the long line. And when we are able to finish ahead of others, we gloat at our resourcefulness without realizing that we have added to our neighbor’s agony because the time that would have rightfully been theirs was spent processing our transaction and have unduly extended their pain of waiting. As Erly de Guzman of Galing Pilipino is wont to say, “Ang gulang naging galing” and we think that being able to put one over our neighbor as a sign of our being “maabilidad” and “wais” is an achievement to be proud of..
A quick search of what’s out there regarding Mang Nano revealed this write up about a movie “Nukso ng Nukso” which Pugo did in 1960 :
“In Nukso nang Nukso, Pugo is Mang Nano Batekabesa, the wily but lovable ‘manggagantso’ who concocts the most ingenuous scams to finance his little vices, like jueteng or cockfighting.”
Talk about role models and screen heroes!
Put all of the aforementioned together and a clearer picture emerges. We want to rise from an impoverished or disadvantaged state we are in but either:
* we feel that somebody ought to do it for us because we long for a superhero to rescue us from our sorry state; or
* we hope to do it ourselves but are too lazy to work for it and thus desperately cling to the arrival of a quick-fix that will magically transform our lives.
So we quietly endure our hardships while waiting for the time to “have our day.” Then whenever an opportunity presents itself where we can put one over our neighbor we grab it with gusto and relish and gloat at the thought that we have once more displayed our being “maabilidad” and “wais.” It somehow eases the pain of discomfort of our disadvantaged state. After a while the distorted sense of “galing” at being so “wais” above the rest has become so pervasive that it has become a natural high that we indulge in it purely for the simple joy of feeling good.
Sure, we may have felt guilty at times because of our largely Christian upbringing. After all, we used to be the only Christian nation in Asia. But we have become so adept at rationalizing our shortcomings that we have managed to develop a value system that is so convolutedly flexible and interchangeable.
When I was asked whether the ideals listed in “Ang ulirang Pinoy” are interchangeable in rank I said “No.” They are listed precisely in that order because they represent a hierarchy of values. In fact, the order that they are supposed to be appreciated and implemented in one’s life is as important as the values that they contain. Without putting significance to the way that they are ordered is to invite ourselves to fall prey to a distorted sense of morals. We have to learn to dichotomize and prioritize whenever we are faced with the dilemma of having to choose between two seemingly positive values. Otherwise we end up with Mass-going, communion-receiving politicians who do not even bat an eyelash in protecting their cronies in the name of “pakikisama” and “utang na loob” because they put a premium on their fear of losing peer approval more than their fear of God.
Yes we are a Christian nation but we have fallen short of our Christian heritage. We have learned to love ourselves but have continuously struggled over the “loving our neighbor as we love ourselves” part. In 2005 when I started the forum of Ang Bagong Pinoy it came out of a frustration that 20 years after EDSA 1 we have hardly anything to show for our victory. The son that I carried on the streets of EDSA who was barely 1 year old then has now graduated from college. A generation has passed. We were greatly moved by the experience of EDSA but it seems we have barely moved since then.
We can’t keep on casting the blame on others without looking at ourselves first. We can’t keep on casting the first stone as if we have no sin that merits a stone being cast our way. We have to try to first effect the change that we want to see in others in ourselves.
Strive to be a better person. Strive to be a more compassionate neighbor. Strive to love our neighbor as ourselves. Strive to be a good citizen of this country. As Alexander Lacson has written in his book, we can start with “twelve little things every Filipino can do to help our country.” And then perhaps the dream of a better Philippines will become a closer reality. Loving our neighbor is at the heart of rebuilding our nation.
As Teacher Nelia Sarcol has so clearly expressed in her Filipino ideology of the Pearl Principle, “strive not just to change from within but to effect change as well within our sphere of influence.” For example, if someone cuts into my lane while I’m driving, I will not curse the person nor pass judgment on him or her because I do not know his/her personal circumstances and I’m not in a position to judge. But I can always influence my wife, my children and other people close to me not to do the same. I will be doing both out of love for my neighbor. Those whom I influence will also try to effect changes within their respective spheres. In due time this will all come full circle. When that time comes, there might not even be a need to cast a stone at all.
The miracle of Couples for Christ ’s Gawad Kalinga has already shown the way to what the transforming love of Christ can do to ordinary people and what these ordinary people can do to their neighbors because of the transforming love of Christ
Let us not tire of doing the little things that love requires. Day by day let us strive to build a character steeped in love and imbued with compassion. During the graduation rites of my youngest child, their First Honor said in her speech, “To reach our objective, we must not tire of doing the little things every day, for in the end, all of these things add up.”

November 24th, 2008 at 4:02 am
How much would be the real cost of joining APEC group?, where business leaders haggle for a free trade agreement advantages to each others benefits to what country of where they belong and the most country that their poor consituent had benefits would be china, so that goes back to the real objective of APEC, does it really help our poor people in the philippines, where mostly being Juan De Cruz is a showing of hopelessness and lack of benefits that deprived of being a real citizen to a country that someones life is connected to this materialistic world we lived in.
November 23rd, 2008 at 7:03 am
How can you say “love your neighbor when your would- be neighbor is attacking you in all fronts.
Is it not just proper to protect yourself and assert your rights? This is the crux of the problem. I have met and talk to lots of supposed responsible citizen, both active in service and those retired. Nobody seems to realize that if the citizen does not assert the right to demand good governance and transparency, our country will surely end as a dead basket of Asia FOREVER!
Are we not humbled by the fact that Vietnam, a communist country, was able to excel inattracting foreign investment, about 40 billion dollars in just one quarter while our President has to travel all the way to Europe and America to attract foreign investors to came and start their business here.
The problem with our government is that it is so corrupt. PGMA does not have to fly to America and talk to prominent investors. Vietnam did not do anything to attract investors. The foreign investors just went in droves to Vietnam because they know that its government is a decent government, in spite of being a communist. In addition, their leaders abhor corruption.
While in our case, our President, our Senate President, our Generals in the Military, our PNP, Customs, our BIR, all seems to be so corrupt. Who would invest here with this kind of situation? We got a black eye when PGMA grab the International Airport Terminal 3. We got another black eye on the attempt to grab Meralco from the Lopezes. We got so many black eye just like when Senator Enrile scolded the foreign investors of charging consumers on full capacity. Why not blame (FVR) “TABAKO”. This blabber mouth and travelling President has mess up the whole contract regarding the charging to the detriment of the consuming public.
Ask “TABAKO” WHO REALLY OWNS THE SUWAL ELECTRIC PLAN in Pangasinan.
How can I love my would-be neighbo whoes husband, knowing that he is incapable to take long trips because of heart ailment, mess up the flight of PGMA, and wasted millions of pesos, again, because of flight diversion to a Osaka, Japan? Imagine the how much money is lost when an aircraft is diverted? Millions of pesos!
Let me tell you how much it cost in people’s tax money for a Presidential flight. First, the aircraft is grounded for a few days before the Presidential flight. For every hour an aircraft stays on ground, the Airline Company losses millions of pesos. Also, scheduled flights are interrupted because companies like this doesn’t have extra jumbo jets aircraft. This aircraft is inspected for airworthiness. Then it is inspected bit by bit for any element that may jeopardize the President and her entourage. Then the aircraft is quarantened, meaning no one can approach this Presidential aircarft least someone may plant a bomb. You have the aircraft maintenance crew, the Presidential Security Command, and other agents wearing maintenance uniform just to secure the aircraft.
How much does it cost the Taxpayer? About 5 million in 3 days just for maintaining the aircraft. Another one is the lost revenue for the Airline. For every flight delays, the Airline Company loses passenger patronage. Sometimes you have to give free extra meals, and to some extend free hotels for long delays. Again, millions of pesos. It may be a lost of about 100 million pesos in terms of revenue. Remember, commercial aircraft seldom stays on the ground. Its insurance and aircraft rental is so high. In three days, a Boeing 747-400 can fly Manila- Los- Angeles- Manila, and side trip to Cebu, Tokyo, Cebu, Manila. The revenue from this flights amounts to hundred of millions of pesos. Yet, our high living President lets the Jambo Jet just sit on the tarmac days on ends. She has done this in Rome, Seville Spain, in Dubai, Hongkong, and so many trips in the “State.” The owner of that Airline may be smiling in her face, but cursing her at her back for the troubles PGMA has cause his Airlines.
Then, one day before the Presidential flights, everyone is getting busy. Security alert is at its peak; Cattering is also busy preparing foods, very expensive foods to feed the crocodiles onboard. The cost of the food varies, but it may be around 2.5 million peos, just for one leg alone. Remember, these arevery expensive foods they serve the President. They also carries expensive wines costing about 25,000 pesos a bottle!
Then selected flight crew (pilots) and Cabin crew (Stewards) are choosen to operate the aircraft. Two sets of Fight crew and about 20 cabin crew boards the aircraft. For the aircraft crew, it will cost the company about 200 thousand pesos a day. This does not include the aircraft maintenance that goes with a presidential flight. Maintenance crew is use to secure the aircraft in foreign airports.
Finally, the aircraft is refueled. Guess how much fuel? About 120 tons of fuel; 120 thousand kilos! The price is about another 20 million pesos. When the airplane reaches its destination, it is charge by the country where it flies over a navigational fee, and at the airport, parking fee and stewage fee, cattering fee, security fee, etc. Another 40 million pesos.
Now, let us speak about the entourage (hangers-on.) Of course these “sabit” if they are Congressman, Senators, Generals, Security personnel; all of them receives per Diem.
If Ex Generals of the PNA, those that went to Russia, received 460 U.S. dollars per day! I can just imagine how much the Presidential entourage would charge “Juan de la Cruz.”
In the ten days stay of PGMA abroad, during the latest fight of Paquio, PGMA spend 1.5 million U.S. dollar in just ten days, or the equivalent of 67 million pesos.
Tell me, how can I love my neighbor who, in spite of knowing that 80% of ethnic Filipinos or 80 million Filipinos can hardly get a decent meal a day, the President still insist with her “high living” considering the “Juan de la Cruz is footing up the bill.
November 23rd, 2008 at 3:58 am
‘Kristong Hari’-Christ the King.
Ito na nga siguro talaga ang dapat nating pangatawanan,ang ating pananampalataya,at sa ating paglilingkod e dapat Siya talaga ang ating Hari.At ng ating tutuong makita at tutuong mapaglingkuran ang Hari,sa mga nagugutom,nauuhaw,mga napapabayaan na,mga dayuhan,mga hubad,maysakit,bilanggo.E talaga namang sila ang nakararami pa rin at tutuong nangangailangan ng kalinga.
November 22nd, 2008 at 2:53 pm
Boogie Baydon,
Your article should be read and taken to heart by every Filipino. I agree with you. We must take “upon ourselves to participate fully in the task of solving” our problems. Do you know that a simple structure can make this idea operational?
Devolve power and wealth to cities and provinces!
Stop Gloria and her successors from having more money than they can judiciously handle. Let us break the stranglehold of Imperial Manila. Let Kapampangans work for Pampanga; Surigaonons for Surigao; Leytenians for Leyte and Davaweños for Davao. Its residents were able to do it for Naga City. We can do it too for our own communities. All that is necessary is an amendment to the Local Government Code, not the Charter.